Philip Lam

Philip Lam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages assessment and personal injury. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Philip Lam has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Overcharging	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employees’ Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restitutionary Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Product Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Scope of duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceuticals Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Products Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Financing Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Account of Share of Profits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Philip Lam has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lam & Co	2 cases	29% of cases	Nagase Singapore v Ching Kai Huat: Conspiracy & Overcharging Dispute(Oct 2007) Nagase Singapore v Ching Kai Huat: Breach of Duty, Conspiracy, Overcharging(May 2007)
Foo, Liew & Philip Lam	2 cases	29% of cases	Grandlink Group Pte Ltd Insolvency: Internationale Container Transport GmbH v Grandlink Group Pte Ltd(Jul 2001) Friis v Casetech: Breach of Contract & Account of Profits Dispute(Jul 2000)
Attorneys Inc. LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	De Cruz v Guangzhou: Slim 10, Director Liability & Negligence(Oct 2003)
Foo Liew and Philip Lam	1 cases	14% of cases	Macquarie v Phoenix: Defamation Claim over Emails to Customers(Dec 2003)
David Chong & Co	1 cases	14% of cases	Grandlink Group Pte Ltd Insolvency: Internationale Container Transport GmbH v Grandlink Group Pte Ltd(Jul 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Philip Lam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 4 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	17%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Partial	35.5 parties avg	5.5	50%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2007	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Philip Lam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	3(43%)	43%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	500,476.26	83,412.716 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nagase Singapore v Ching Kai Huat: Conspiracy & Overcharging Dispute 02 Oct 2007 Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Oct 2007	Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partDamages awarded for conspiracy and negligence. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Nagase Singapore v Ching Kai Huat: Breach of Duty, Conspiracy, Overcharging 03 May 2007 Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	03 May 2007	Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff against D Logistics, Ching Kai Huat, Clement Yip, and Mary Ting Chi Fong for sums to be determined. The amount due to the plaintiff would be $125,238.13 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Macquarie v Phoenix: Defamation Claim over Emails to Customers 29 Dec 2003 Phoenix Communications Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	29 Dec 2003	Phoenix Communications Pte Ltd (Defendant): IndemnifiedThe second defendant was ordered to indemnify the first defendant against the plaintiff's claim, which was settled for $250,000 inclusive of costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	De Cruz v Guangzhou: Slim 10, Director Liability & Negligence 02 Oct 2003 Semon Liu Kelun (Defendant)Lost	02 Oct 2003	Semon Liu Kelun (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment is given for the plaintiff against the second, third and fourth defendants for the amounts computed above together with costs to be taxed or agreed. There is to be only one set of costs in respect of the second and third defendants. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
5	Grandlink Group Pte Ltd Insolvency: Internationale Container Transport GmbH v Grandlink Group Pte Ltd 03 Jul 2001 Internationale Container Trasnport GmbH (Petitioner)Won	03 Jul 2001	Internationale Container Trasnport GmbH (Petitioner): Petition GrantedPetition to wind up Grandlink Group Pte Ltd was granted. No monetary amount was specified in the outcome. Assumed currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Friis v Casetech: Breach of Contract & Account of Profits Dispute 13 Jul 2000 Stevany Wiffen (Appellant)Won	13 Jul 2000	Stevany Wiffen (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed. The court awarded her the costs of defending the claims below and the costs of her appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.