Phipps Jonathan

Phipps Jonathan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and intellectual property law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Elements of crime	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Common Gaming Houses Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Actus Reus	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Phipps Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Phipps Jonathan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
LegalStandard LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	East Coast Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd v Family Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Dispute(Apr 2024) Sim Chon Ang Jason v Public Prosecutor: Application to Adduce Further Evidence in Cheating Trial(Sep 2022)
Wee, Tay & Lim LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Bijabahadur Rai v Public Prosecutor: Assisting Illegal Lottery & Common Gaming Houses Act(Jul 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Phipps Jonathan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Phipps Jonathan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	1,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	East Coast Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd v Family Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Dispute 16 Apr 2024 East Coast Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd (Claimant)Lost	16 Apr 2024	East Coast Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd (Claimant): Claim DismissedThe claimant's claims for trade mark infringement and passing off were dismissed.
2	Sim Chon Ang Jason v Public Prosecutor: Application to Adduce Further Evidence in Cheating Trial 25 Sep 2022 Jason Sim Chon Ang (Applicant)Lost	25 Sep 2022	Jason Sim Chon Ang (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to adduce further evidence was dismissed; applicant ordered to pay costs of $2,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Bijabahadur Rai v Public Prosecutor: Assisting Illegal Lottery & Common Gaming Houses Act 09 Jul 2017 Bijabahadur Rai s/o Shree Kantrai (Appellant)Partial	09 Jul 2017	Bijabahadur Rai s/o Shree Kantrai (Appellant): Appeal allowed in part, convicted of lesser chargeAppeal against conviction under s 5(a) of the Common Gaming Houses Act allowed. Convicted of a lesser charge under s 9(1) of the CGHA read with ss 107 and 109 of the Penal Code and sentenced to a fine of $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).