P.O. Ram

P.O. Ram is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and offences. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

P.O. Ram has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and drug crimes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Youthful Offenders	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed moneylending	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Reformative Training	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P.O. Ram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

P.O. Ram has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M/s Hin Rai & Tan	1 cases	100% of cases	Nur Azilah v PP: Youth Offender Sentencing, Moneylender Harassment & Rehabilitation(Jul 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of P.O. Ram's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of P.O. Ram's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nur Azilah v PP: Youth Offender Sentencing, Moneylender Harassment & Rehabilitation 28 Jul 2010 Nur Azilah Bte Ithnin (Appellant)Won	28 Jul 2010	Nur Azilah Bte Ithnin (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed and the prison term was substituted with reformative training.