Poon Ho Yen Claudia

Poon Ho Yen Claudia is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Financial Crisis	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Investment Advice	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Investment Portfolio	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Poon Ho Yen Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Poon Ho Yen Claudia has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 cases	100% of cases	Go Dante Yap v Bank Austria: Investment Losses & Bank's Duty of Care(Aug 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Poon Ho Yen Claudia's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Poon Ho Yen Claudia's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Go Dante Yap v Bank Austria: Investment Losses & Bank's Duty of Care 04 Aug 2010 Go Dante Yap (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Aug 2010	Go Dante Yap (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to be taxed unless agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.