Prabhakaran Nair

Prabhakaran Nair is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and credit and security. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated expertise across 50 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commissions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Health Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Disability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Titles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Ownership Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Right of Way	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schizophrenia	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Prabhakaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Prabhakaran Nair has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ong Tan & Nair	5 cases	50% of cases	OTF Aquarium Farm v Lian Shing Construction: Negligence, Nuisance, and Damages for Loss of Fish(Aug 2010) Lian Kok Hong v Lee Choi Kheong: Easement Dispute over Right of Way on Belmont Road(Apr 2010) George Abraham Vadakathu v Jacob George: Testamentary Capacity of Schizophrenic Testator(Apr 2009)
Derrick Wong & Lim BC LLP	4 cases	40% of cases	Sim Kim Seng v New West Coast Shipyard: Summary Judgment & Quantum Meruit(Feb 2016) Chiam Heng Hsien v Law Society: Application for Disciplinary Tribunal(Jan 2013) Ho Wah Nam v Tan Kim Siang Luke: Assessment of Damages for Cardiac Arrest During Stapedectomy(Nov 2012)
Ong, Tan and Nair	1 cases	10% of cases	OCBC v Tan Teck Khong: Mortgage Enforceability & Undue Influence in Property Transaction(Mar 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Prabhakaran Nair's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 2 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.2 parties avg	3.2	40%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	10%
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2012	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Prabhakaran Nair's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(40%)	40%
Partial	1(10%)	10%
Won	5(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	23,408.55	3,344.087 cases	7
USD	201,438.00	201,438.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sim Kim Seng v New West Coast Shipyard: Summary Judgment & Quantum Meruit 02 Feb 2016 New West Coast Shipyard Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	02 Feb 2016	New West Coast Shipyard Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Leave to Defend GrantedDefendant was granted unconditional leave to defend.
2	Chiam Heng Hsien v Law Society: Application for Disciplinary Tribunal 24 Jan 2013 Law Society of Singapore (Defendant)Won	24 Jan 2013	Law Society of Singapore (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication dismissed with costs fixed at $4,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ho Wah Nam v Tan Kim Siang Luke: Assessment of Damages for Cardiac Arrest During Stapedectomy 06 Nov 2012 Ho Wah Nam (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Nov 2012	Ho Wah Nam (Plaintiff): Damages AwardedAwarded $4,000 for general damages (pain and suffering) and $2,708.55 for special damages. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Jesuraj Daniel v Vadivelu Pandi Devi: Trust, Share Transfer Dispute 01 Apr 2012 Chennai Ponnusamy Hotels & Restaurant Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	01 Apr 2012	Chennai Ponnusamy Hotels & Restaurant Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court dismissed the defendant's counterclaim for $40,700.
5	OTF Aquarium Farm v Lian Shing Construction: Negligence, Nuisance, and Damages for Loss of Fish 23 Aug 2010 OTF Aquarium Farm (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	23 Aug 2010	OTF Aquarium Farm (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; damages of $12,700 awarded for the dead fishes. Claims for economic loss and re-instatement of ponds denied. Costs of the assessment to be taxed on the Magistrate’s Court’s scale. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Lian Kok Hong v Lee Choi Kheong: Easement Dispute over Right of Way on Belmont Road 27 Apr 2010 Lian Kok Hong (Appellant)Won	27 Apr 2010	Lian Kok Hong (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; each party to bear his/their own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	George Abraham Vadakathu v Jacob George: Testamentary Capacity of Schizophrenic Testator 02 Apr 2009 George Abraham Vadakathu (Appellant)Won	02 Apr 2009	George Abraham Vadakathu (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs to the Appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Lian Kok Hong v Ow Wah Foong: Limitation Act & Negligence in Issuing Termination Certificate 09 Jul 2008 Lian Kok Hong (Appellant)Lost	09 Jul 2008	Lian Kok Hong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	OCBC v Tan Teck Khong: Mortgage Enforceability & Undue Influence in Property Transaction 29 Mar 2005 Tan Teck Khong and Another (committee of the estate of Pang Jong Wan, mentally disordered) (Defendant)Lost	29 Mar 2005	Tan Teck Khong and Another (committee of the estate of Pang Jong Wan, mentally disordered) (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed due to affirmation of the mortgage (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	PT Dwiputra v Ho Ming: Recovery of Misappropriated Commission Payments 05 Sep 2000 PT Dwiputra Sumber Sukses (Plaintiff)Won	05 Sep 2000	PT Dwiputra Sumber Sukses (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $201,438 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves USD amounts and the parties are international).