Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair

Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in torts and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agarwood Investment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wakaf Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Derrick Wong & Lim BC LLP	3 cases	50% of cases	Mohamed Shariff Valibhoy v Arif Valibhoy: Jurisdiction over Muslim Charitable Trusts (Wakaf) & Trustee Removal(Jan 2016) ATS v ATT: Appeal on Child Custody, Maintenance, and Division of Matrimonial Assets(Aug 2013) Jinsung Construction v Roko Trading: Conversion of Construction Equipment and Director's Personal Liability(Mar 2012)
Ong Tan & Nair	2 cases	33% of cases	Faber Image Media v Patrician Holdings: Sub-Tenancy Dispute Over Boat Quay Premises(Jan 2009) Heow Mee Han v Cheong Hock Kiam: Estate Distribution, Hotel Grand Central Shares, and Trustee's Duty(Feb 2008)
Karan Nair and Co	1 cases	17% of cases	Ye Huishi Rachel v Ng Ke Ming Jerry: Agarwood Investment Dispute over Settlement Agreement(Nov 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Lost	44.3 parties avg	4.3	67%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Prabhakaran s/o Narayanan Nair's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(17%)	17%
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,925,900.00	1,308,633.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ye Huishi Rachel v Ng Ke Ming Jerry: Agarwood Investment Dispute over Settlement Agreement 01 Nov 2021 Ye Huishi Rachel (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Nov 2021	Ye Huishi Rachel (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for $1,225,900.00 was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Mohamed Shariff Valibhoy v Arif Valibhoy: Jurisdiction over Muslim Charitable Trusts (Wakaf) & Trustee Removal 28 Jan 2016 Vali Mohamed Shariff Valibhoy (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jan 2016	Vali Mohamed Shariff Valibhoy (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiffs' application in OS 355 to remove a trustee of a wakaf was legally unsustainable as the court had no subject matter jurisdiction over the VCT pursuant to the Trustees Act and the Plaintiffs had no locus standi to bring OS 355.
3	ATS v ATT: Appeal on Child Custody, Maintenance, and Division of Matrimonial Assets 19 Aug 2013 ATT (Defendant, Appellant)Dismissed	19 Aug 2013	ATT (Defendant, Appellant): Application dismissedHusband's application to vary the orders relating to care and control and maintenance was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Jinsung Construction v Roko Trading: Conversion of Construction Equipment and Director's Personal Liability 08 Mar 2012 Choi Sung Jong (Defendant)Lost	08 Mar 2012	Choi Sung Jong (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffSecond defendant is personally liable for the conversion of the equipment, as a joint tortfeasor together with the first defendant, on the basis that he had ‘procured or directed’ the wrong. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Faber Image Media v Patrician Holdings: Sub-Tenancy Dispute Over Boat Quay Premises 12 Jan 2009 Rajeev Saxena (Defendant)Won	12 Jan 2009	Rajeev Saxena (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the second defendant was dismissed.
6	Heow Mee Han v Cheong Hock Kiam: Estate Distribution, Hotel Grand Central Shares, and Trustee's Duty 25 Feb 2008 Cheong Hock Kiam (Defendant)Lost	25 Feb 2008	Cheong Hock Kiam (Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be taxed or agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.