Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman

Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judgments and orders and legal ethics and professional responsibility. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in examination of judgment debtor and judgments and orders.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Examination of judgment debtor	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Attorney-General v Jill Phua: Disciplinary Proceedings & Duty of Candour in Legal Profession Act(Aug 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Treaty on Judicial Assistance(May 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Examination Order Dispute(Mar 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	33.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Attorney-General v Jill Phua: Disciplinary Proceedings & Duty of Candour in Legal Profession Act 19 Aug 2024 Law Society of Singapore (Other)Neutral	19 Aug 2024	Law Society of Singapore (Other): NeutralThe Law Society of Singapore took the view that a minimum reinstatement interval of between two and three years would be sufficient in the circumstances (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Treaty on Judicial Assistance 27 May 2024 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 May 2024	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to vary or discharge the order setting aside the service out order was dismissed.
3	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Examination Order Dispute 26 Mar 2024 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Mar 2024	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): PartialThe court upheld the examination order but set aside the order granting leave to serve Ms. Fan out of jurisdiction, and consequently, the substituted service order. The court also set aside the order granting leave to serve Mr. Ruan out of jurisdiction, subject to any application made within 10 days by the parties or either of them to vary or discharge the order.