Prasad Karunakarn

Prasad Karunakarn is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and commercial litigation.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and commercial leasing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Co-broking agreement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sale	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Agency	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prasad Karunakarn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Prasad Karunakarn has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tang & Tan	1 cases	100% of cases	Philip Motha Consultancy v Jones Lang Lasalle: Co-broking Agreement Dispute(Nov 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Prasad Karunakarn's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Prasad Karunakarn's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Philip Motha Consultancy v Jones Lang Lasalle: Co-broking Agreement Dispute 26 Nov 2002 Philip Motha Consultancy Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Nov 2002	Philip Motha Consultancy Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for a share of the commission and a refund of the forfeited tender fee was dismissed.