Prasanna Prabhakaran

Prasanna Prabhakaran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and personal injury.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Worker Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Prasanna Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Prasanna Prabhakaran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
RLC Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Lim Zhipeng v Seow Suat Thin: Guarantee Enforceability & Consideration in Debt Recovery(Sep 2020)
Karuppan Chettiar & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Pandian Marimuthu v Guan Leong Construction: Appeal for Security of Costs in Personal Injury Claim(May 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Prasanna Prabhakaran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Prasanna Prabhakaran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Zhipeng v Seow Suat Thin: Guarantee Enforceability & Consideration in Debt Recovery 07 Sep 2020 Seow Suat Thin (Respondent)Lost	07 Sep 2020	Seow Suat Thin (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; judgment entered against the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Pandian Marimuthu v Guan Leong Construction: Appeal for Security of Costs in Personal Injury Claim 15 May 2001 Guan Leong Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	15 May 2001	Guan Leong Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the order for security for costs was dismissed.