Pratap Kishan

Pratap Kishan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 23.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 27% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pratap Kishan has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	8 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Identification Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abetment of Trafficking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sex Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pratap Kishan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pratap Kishan has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kishan & V Suria Partnership	3 cases	27% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Azman: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act(Jul 2010) Public Prosecutor v Amayapan Kodanpany: Sexual Abuse of a Young Person under the Children and Young Persons Act(Feb 2010) Public Prosecutor v Khor Soon Lee: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2009)
Sim Mong Teck & Partners	2 cases	18% of cases	PP v Rajagopalan Tamilarasan: Trafficking of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2001) Thiruselvam v PP: Abetment of Trafficking, Equal Protection & Witness Confessions(Mar 2001)
Ho Wong Law Practice LLC	2 cases	18% of cases	HG Metal Manufacturing v Gayathri Steels: Breach of Contract & Guarantee Dispute(Nov 2017) Almega Investments v Chiang Sing Jeong: Breach of Contract & Implied Terms Dispute(Aug 2017)
S Ratnam & Associates	1 cases	9% of cases	Public Prosecutor v. Thiruselvan: Abetment of Cannabis Trafficking(Oct 2000)
M/s Kishan LLC	1 cases	9% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Devendran: Importation of Diamorphine and Wilful Blindness(Jul 2014)
Kishan Law Chambers LLC	1 cases	9% of cases	Lim Chong Poon v Chiang Sing Jeong: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Trust Deed(Mar 2020)
A Rajandran Joseph and Nayar	1 cases	9% of cases	Govindaraj Perumalsamy v PP: Identification Parade Irregularities and Sentencing in Robbery with Hurt Case(Feb 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pratap Kishan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 3 (27%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	9%
Lost	83.2 parties avg	3.2	73%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	9%
Won	33.7 parties avg	3.7	27%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	23.8 parties avg	3.8
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pratap Kishan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(8%)	8%
Lost	8(62%)	62%
Neutral	1(8%)	8%
Won	3(23%)	23%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	15,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Chong Poon v Chiang Sing Jeong: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Trust Deed 29 Mar 2020 Chiang Sing Jeong (Respondent, Defendant)Won	29 Mar 2020	Chiang Sing Jeong (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $30,000 (all-in) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	HG Metal Manufacturing v Gayathri Steels: Breach of Contract & Guarantee Dispute 08 Nov 2017 Sherine Sangeetha Navaratnam (Defendant)Neutral	08 Nov 2017	Sherine Sangeetha Navaratnam (Defendant): No OrderNo orders made against the third defendant as the July Guarantee was superseded.
3	Almega Investments v Chiang Sing Jeong: Breach of Contract & Implied Terms Dispute 14 Aug 2017 Chiang Sing Jeong (Defendant)Dismissed	14 Aug 2017	Chiang Sing Jeong (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim for return of deposit was dismissed.
4	Public Prosecutor v Devendran: Importation of Diamorphine and Wilful Blindness 13 Jul 2014 Devendran a/l Supramaniam (Defendant)Lost	13 Jul 2014	Devendran a/l Supramaniam (Defendant): ConvictedThe accused was convicted of importing 83.36 grammes of diamorphine into Singapore.
5	Public Prosecutor v Azman: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Jul 2010 Tamil Salvem (Defendant)Won	08 Jul 2010	Tamil Salvem (Defendant): AcquittedSecond accused acquitted.
6	Public Prosecutor v Amayapan Kodanpany: Sexual Abuse of a Young Person under the Children and Young Persons Act 11 Feb 2010 Amayapan Kodanpany (Accused)Lost	11 Feb 2010	Amayapan Kodanpany (Accused): Guilty Plea AcceptedAccused pleaded guilty to three amended charges under the Children and Young Persons Act.
7	Public Prosecutor v Khor Soon Lee: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 30 Dec 2009 Khor Soon Lee (Defendant)Lost	30 Dec 2009	Khor Soon Lee (Defendant): ConvictionThe accused was convicted of importing diamorphine.
8	Govindaraj Perumalsamy v PP: Identification Parade Irregularities and Sentencing in Robbery with Hurt Case 03 Feb 2004 Soupramaniane D Jeamany (Appellant)Won	03 Feb 2004	Soupramaniane D Jeamany (Appellant): Appeal allowedThe appellant's appeal was allowed by the court.
9	PP v Rajagopalan Tamilarasan: Trafficking of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Oct 2001 Panneerselvan s/o Lallayah (Defendant)Lost	03 Oct 2001	Panneerselvan s/o Lallayah (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of conspiring to traffic in a controlled drug and sentenced to death.
10	Thiruselvam v PP: Abetment of Trafficking, Equal Protection & Witness Confessions 01 Mar 2001 Thiruselvam s/o Nagaratnam (Appellant)Lost	01 Mar 2001	Thiruselvam s/o Nagaratnam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Assumed currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Public Prosecutor v. Thiruselvan: Abetment of Cannabis Trafficking 03 Oct 2000 Thiruselvan s/o Nagaratnam (Defendant)Lost	03 Oct 2000	Thiruselvan s/o Nagaratnam (Defendant): Accused found guiltyThe accused was found guilty of abetting Katheraven in trafficking cannabis.