Preshin Manmindar

Preshin Manmindar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and abuse of process. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Further and better particulars	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Preshin Manmindar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Preshin Manmindar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Damodara Ong LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Henderson Doctrine & Abuse of Process in Solicitor Conflict Case(Nov 2024) Access Medical v MHC Medical: Dispute over MOA Breach and Particulars(Nov 2023) Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out & Amendments in Hin Leong & Ocean Tankers Cases(Aug 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Preshin Manmindar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Partial	111.0 parties avg	11.0	33%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	25.8 parties avg	5.8
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Preshin Manmindar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Henderson Doctrine & Abuse of Process in Solicitor Conflict Case 24 Nov 2024 Lim Huey Ching (Appellant, Applicant)Won	24 Nov 2024	Lim Huey Ching (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the Henderson doctrine was inapplicable, and there was no general abuse of process.
2	Access Medical v MHC Medical: Dispute over MOA Breach and Particulars 22 Nov 2023 Lim Yong Chin (Respondent)Partial	22 Nov 2023	Lim Yong Chin (Respondent): Application allowed in partDr Lim’s application for further and better particulars of the Defence and Counterclaim (Amendment No 1) was allowed in part.
3	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out & Amendments in Hin Leong & Ocean Tankers Cases 14 Aug 2023 Lim Huey Ching (Applicant)Lost	14 Aug 2023	Lim Huey Ching (Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.