Priscilla Chia Wen Qi

Priscilla Chia Wen Qi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in constitutional law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 10.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and statutory interpretation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Endangered Species Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Good Faith and Fidelity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Infectious Diseases Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal statutes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Environmental Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Priscilla Chia Wen Qi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Peter Low & Choo LLC	10 cases	100% of cases	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression(Feb 2022) Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Material Witness Disclosure, and Bailment of Drugs(Nov 2021) Muhammad Nabill v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Material Witness Statements(Mar 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Priscilla Chia Wen Qi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 2 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.0 parties avg	3.0	60%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	30%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	10%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	42.6 parties avg	2.6
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Priscilla Chia Wen Qi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(60%)	60%
Partial	3(30%)	30%
Won	1(10%)	10%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,545.45	10,181.823 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression 27 Feb 2022 Choong Chee Hong (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	27 Feb 2022	Choong Chee Hong (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Section 377A deemed unenforceable unless Attorney-General signals change in prosecutorial policy.
2	Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Material Witness Disclosure, and Bailment of Drugs 10 Nov 2021 Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	10 Nov 2021	Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedRoshdi's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
3	Muhammad Nabill v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Material Witness Statements 30 Mar 2020 Muhammad Nabill bin Mohd Fuad (Appellant)Partial	30 Mar 2020	Muhammad Nabill bin Mohd Fuad (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partConviction for trafficking in diamorphine set aside, substituted with conviction for possession. Conviction for trafficking in cannabis set aside.
4	Ong Ming Johnson v Attorney-General: Challenge to Section 377A Fails 29 Mar 2020 Choong Chee Hong (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Mar 2020	Choong Chee Hong (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to declare s 377A unconstitutional was dismissed.
5	GCP v Public Prosecutor: Infectious Diseases Act & HIV Transmission Sentencing 25 Jun 2019 GCP (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	25 Jun 2019	GCP (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
6	Attorney-General v Wham Kwok Han Jolovan: Contempt of Court Sentencing 28 Apr 2019 Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Respondent)Lost	28 Apr 2019	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Respondent): Fine imposedFine of SGD 5,000 imposed, with one week’s imprisonment in default. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	HT SRL v Wee Shuo Woon: Breach of Contract, Illegality, Public Policy, Restraint of Trade, Employee's Duty of Good Faith 17 Apr 2019 Wee Shuo Woon (Defendant)Partial	17 Apr 2019	Wee Shuo Woon (Defendant): Counterclaim allowed in partCounterclaim allowed for unpaid salary ($23,545.45) and expenses ($345.47) with employer's CPF contribution ($1,700.00) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Kong Hoo v Public Prosecutor: Interpreting 'In Transit' under the Endangered Species Act 07 Apr 2019 Wong Wee Keong (Applicant)Won	07 Apr 2019	Wong Wee Keong (Applicant): Appeal AllowedConviction quashed and sentence set aside.
9	AG v Wham Kwok Han Jolovan: Freedom of Speech & Contempt of Court 08 Oct 2018 Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Respondent)Lost	08 Oct 2018	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Respondent): ConvictedConvicted for scandalising contempt under s 3(1)(a) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016.
10	Neo Ah Luan v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Dermal Filler Injections & Medical Registration Act Violation 02 Sep 2018 Neo Ah Luan (Appellant)Partial	02 Sep 2018	Neo Ah Luan (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; sentence reduced to six weeks' imprisonment per charge, to run concurrently (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).