Priscilla Wee Jia Ling

Priscilla Wee Jia Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and professional conduct. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in medical negligence and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Medical Negligence	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pathology	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Priscilla Wee Jia Ling has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Armstrong v Quest Laboratories: Negligence, Causation, and Damages in Medical Tort(Mar 2018) Lam Kwok Tai Leslie v. Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Failure to Obtain Informed Consent(Oct 2017) Tan Gek Suan v Lau Kean Wah: Striking Out Pleadings for Lack of Cause of Action in Negligence Claim(Jul 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Priscilla Wee Jia Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Priscilla Wee Jia Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,241,334.00	1,241,334.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Armstrong v Quest Laboratories: Negligence, Causation, and Damages in Medical Tort 20 Mar 2018 Quest Laboratories Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2018	Quest Laboratories Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against the DefendantThe defendant was ordered to pay $1,241,334 in damages to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Lam Kwok Tai Leslie v. Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Failure to Obtain Informed Consent 19 Oct 2017 Lam Kwok Tai Leslie (Appellant)Won	19 Oct 2017	Lam Kwok Tai Leslie (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction for professional misconduct allowed; sentence and costs orders set aside.
3	Tan Gek Suan v Lau Kean Wah: Striking Out Pleadings for Lack of Cause of Action in Negligence Claim 04 Jul 2017 Lau Kean Wah (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	04 Jul 2017	Lau Kean Wah (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was allowed in part, with the plaintiffs' claim for damages and aggravated damages struck out.