Priscylia Wu

Priscylia Wu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Priscylia Wu has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and criminal revision.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Tortious liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Priscylia Wu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Priscylia Wu has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	Ong Han Ling v American International Assurance: Insurance Fraud, Vicarious Liability & Conspiracy(Dec 2017) Tan Swee Wan v Lian Tian Yong Johnny: Striking Out Pleadings in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim(Sep 2016) Devendran v PP: Importation of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Statutory Presumption(May 2015)
Kelvin Chia Partnership	1 cases	20% of cases	H P Construction v Chin Ivan: Stay of Proceedings for Alleged Fraud in Architect's Certificates(Jul 2014)
Drew & Naiper LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Md Rafiqul Islam Abdul Aziz v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Conviction Under Work Injury Compensation Act(Dec 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Priscylia Wu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.6 parties avg	3.6	60%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Priscylia Wu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	704,801.22	234,933.743 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ong Han Ling v American International Assurance: Insurance Fraud, Vicarious Liability & Conspiracy 28 Dec 2017 AIA SINGAPORE PRIVATE LIMITED (Defendant)Lost	28 Dec 2017	AIA SINGAPORE PRIVATE LIMITED (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe AIA defendants’ Counterclaim against the plaintiffs is dismissed.
2	Md Rafiqul Islam Abdul Aziz v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Conviction Under Work Injury Compensation Act 08 Dec 2016 Md Rafiqul Islam Abdul Aziz (Applicant)Won	08 Dec 2016	Md Rafiqul Islam Abdul Aziz (Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe application was allowed, and the conviction and sentence imposed on the applicant were set aside.
3	Tan Swee Wan v Lian Tian Yong Johnny: Striking Out Pleadings in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 27 Sep 2016 Kelvin Low Keng Siang (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	27 Sep 2016	Kelvin Low Keng Siang (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed in favor of the Defendant; Paragraph 26(d) of the SOC was struck out. Costs of S$5,000 (excluding reasonable disbursements) to be paid by the Plaintiffs to the Defendant. Costs of S$2,400 ordered by the AR for the hearing below and previously paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiffs was to be returned to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Devendran v PP: Importation of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Statutory Presumption 04 May 2015 Devendran a/l Supramaniam (Appellant)Lost	04 May 2015	Devendran a/l Supramaniam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppellant's appeal against conviction and sentence for importing diamorphine was dismissed.
5	H P Construction v Chin Ivan: Stay of Proceedings for Alleged Fraud in Architect's Certificates 09 Jul 2014 H P Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	09 Jul 2014	H P Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; stay of proceedings granted only for the disputed items. The remaining claimed sums can proceed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.