Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh

Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and trademarks. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trade names and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trade names	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Registration criteria	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Distinctiveness	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Industrial application	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conflicts with earlier marks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Service mark	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mirandah Law LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty(Jul 2017) Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd: Trade Mark Dispute over CAESARSTONE Mark(Apr 2017)
Infinitus Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	Mainfreight (S) Pte Ltd v Mainfreight International Logistics Pte Ltd: Passing Off of Trade Name and Service Mark(Aug 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Prithipal Singh s/o Seva Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty 31 Jul 2017 Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	31 Jul 2017	Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed with costs to be taxed or agreed, including the costs of and incidental to the application for leave to appeal.
2	Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd: Trade Mark Dispute over CAESARSTONE Mark 25 Apr 2017 CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD (Respondent)Lost	25 Apr 2017	CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Respondent’s CAESARSTONE Mark shall not proceed to registration. The Respondent shall pay the Appellant its disbursements and half its costs here and below. For the avoidance of doubt, the latter includes the costs of: (a) this appeal; (b) the hearing before the Judge and; (c) the hearing before the PAR. The costs and disbursements are to be taxed if not agreed. We also make the usual consequential order for the payment out of the security. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Mainfreight (S) Pte Ltd v Mainfreight International Logistics Pte Ltd: Passing Off of Trade Name and Service Mark 14 Aug 2012 Mainfreight (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Aug 2012	Mainfreight (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; an inquiry as to the damages suffered by the plaintiff or an account of the profits made by the defendant from all the alleged acts of passing off and the defendant shall pay the plaintiff all sums found due upon the inquiry (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).