Probin Dass

Probin Dass is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and arbitration. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Probin Dass has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discontinuance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Guarantees	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Irregularity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Probin Dass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Probin Dass has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	4 cases	50% of cases	Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors(Aug 2018) BC Andaman v Xie Ning Yun: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration of Blue Canyon Country Club Dispute(Mar 2017) Grains and Industrial Products Trading Pte Ltd v Bank of India: Letter of Credit & Agency(May 2016)
Rajah and Tann	3 cases	38% of cases	Hub Warrior v QBE Insurance: Negligence, Marine Insurance & Rectification(Dec 2004) Melati: Discontinuance Without Leave & Extension of Time for Statement of Claim(Jun 2004) The "Melati" (No 2): Appeal on Extension of Time to File Statement of Claim(Apr 2004)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	13% of cases	The Melati: Discontinuance of Action Due to Late Service of Statement of Claim(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Probin Dass's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	38%
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	13%
Won	45.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Probin Dass's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(11%)	11%
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Won	4(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors 15 Aug 2018 DBS Bank (Other)Neutral	15 Aug 2018	DBS Bank (Other): NeutralDBS Bank was represented by counsel.
2	BC Andaman v Xie Ning Yun: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration of Blue Canyon Country Club Dispute 30 Mar 2017 Murex Co Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Mar 2017	Murex Co Limited (Plaintiff): Permanent anti-suit injunction deniedPermanent anti-suit injunction denied in favour of Murex Co Limited against the Sias.
3	Grains and Industrial Products Trading Pte Ltd v Bank of India: Letter of Credit & Agency 22 May 2016 Bank of India (Respondent)Dismissed	22 May 2016	Bank of India (Respondent): Claim DismissedClaim against Bank of India dismissed.
4	Grains and Industrial Products Trading Pte Ltd v Bank of India: Letter of Credit Dispute 29 Dec 2014 Bank of India (Defendant)Won	29 Dec 2014	Bank of India (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against Bank of India was dismissed.
5	Hub Warrior v QBE Insurance: Negligence, Marine Insurance & Rectification 27 Dec 2004 QBE Insurance (Malaysia) Bhd (Defendant)Won	27 Dec 2004	QBE Insurance (Malaysia) Bhd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
6	Melati: Discontinuance Without Leave & Extension of Time for Statement of Claim 27 Jun 2004 Cargo owners (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	27 Jun 2004	Cargo owners (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	The "Melati" (No 2): Appeal on Extension of Time to File Statement of Claim 14 Apr 2004 The "Melati" (No 2) (Appellant)Won	14 Apr 2004	The "Melati" (No 2) (Appellant): Appeal was properly broughtThe court held that the appeal was properly brought because the orders of Ang J were interlocutory orders and the shipowners complied with s 34(1)(c) of the SCJA.
8	The Melati: Discontinuance of Action Due to Late Service of Statement of Claim 20 Oct 2003 Defendants (Respondent)Lost	20 Oct 2003	Defendants (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court extended the time for service of the Statement of Claim.