Quah Wei Sheng Danny

Quah Wei Sheng Danny is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and insolvency law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Quah Wei Sheng Danny has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Quah Wei Sheng Danny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Quah Wei Sheng Danny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Quah Wei Sheng Danny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Quah Wei Sheng Danny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quah Wei Sheng Danny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Quah Wei Sheng Danny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Quah Wei Sheng Danny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quah Wei Sheng Danny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Quah Wei Sheng Danny has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
CHP Law LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Loh Cheng Lee Aaron v Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Winding Up for Cryptocurrency Liabilities under IRDA(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Quah Wei Sheng Danny's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Quah Wei Sheng Danny's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Loh Cheng Lee Aaron v Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Winding Up for Cryptocurrency Liabilities under IRDA 09 Nov 2023 Simon Eric Lee (Non-party)Neutral	09 Nov 2023	Simon Eric Lee (Non-party): NeutralSimon Eric Lee was a non-party in this case (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).