Quek Teck Liang

Quek Teck Liang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judicial management and mareva injunctions. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Guarantees	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Asset Dissipation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quek Teck Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Quek Teck Liang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors(Aug 2018) China Medical Technologies v Wu Xiaodong: Mareva Injunction & Foreign Proceedings(Aug 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Quek Teck Liang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	50%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	26.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Quek Teck Liang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors 15 Aug 2018 Swiber Offshore Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Neutral	15 Aug 2018	Swiber Offshore Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): Directions givenDirections given to the judicial managers.
2	China Medical Technologies v Wu Xiaodong: Mareva Injunction & Foreign Proceedings 12 Aug 2018 CMED Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	12 Aug 2018	CMED Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff): Mareva injunction granted against Bi XiaoqiongMareva injunction granted against Bi Xiaoqiong to prohibit the disposal of assets in Singapore.