Quek Wen Jiang Gerard

Quek Wen Jiang Gerard is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages and torts. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in unjust enrichment and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Unjust Enrichment	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Handwriting Analysis	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Secretarial Services	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Choses in Action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reef Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Environmental Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Quek Wen Jiang Gerard has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PDLegal LLC	4 cases	80% of cases	Banner (China) Investment v Ang: Signature Specimen Selection for Handwriting Analysis(Jan 2025) ByBit Fintech Ltd v Ho Kai Xin: Summary Judgment for Crypto Asset Theft and Constructive Trust(Jul 2023) Simran Bedi v Mark A Montgomery: Breach of Contract, Share Transfer Dispute(Mar 2022)
PD Legal LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Chen Mingxing v Zhang Jian: Interim Injunction for OEL Shares Dispute(Jan 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Quek Wen Jiang Gerard's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.8
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Partial	111.0 parties avg	11.0	20%
Won	24.5 parties avg	4.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Quek Wen Jiang Gerard's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	377,190.00	188,595.002 cases	2
USD	829,650.80	829,650.801 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Banner (China) Investment v Ang: Signature Specimen Selection for Handwriting Analysis 19 Jan 2025 Ang Jimmy Tjun Min (Defendant)Lost	19 Jan 2025	Ang Jimmy Tjun Min (Defendant): Directions to standDirections made for obtaining signature samples for handwriting analysis are to stand.
2	ByBit Fintech Ltd v Ho Kai Xin: Summary Judgment for Crypto Asset Theft and Constructive Trust 24 Jul 2023 ByBit Fintech Limited (Claimant)Won	24 Jul 2023	ByBit Fintech Limited (Claimant): Judgment for ClaimantSummary judgment granted in favor of ByBit Fintech Limited. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the jurisdiction's primary currency (SGD) is assumed.
3	Simran Bedi v Mark A Montgomery: Breach of Contract, Share Transfer Dispute 30 Mar 2022 Simran Bedi (Plaintiff)Won	30 Mar 2022	Simran Bedi (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages awarded in the amount of S$377,190 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Jesse Remalmog v Sevilla Knutsen: Assessment of Damages for Coral Reef Damage 27 Jan 2022 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “Sevilla Knutsen” (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2022	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “Sevilla Knutsen” (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of $829,650.80 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar valuations and originates from Singapore).
5	Chen Mingxing v Zhang Jian: Interim Injunction for OEL Shares Dispute 04 Jan 2021 Zhu Tao (Plaintiff)Partial	04 Jan 2021	Zhu Tao (Plaintiff): Interim injunction granted in partInterim injunction granted with a limitation as to its scope to 197,545,000 of the ordinary shares in OEL which were purchased from Mr Hing on or around 16 December 2019.