R Arvindren

R Arvindren is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and criminal law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

R Arvindren has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Arvindren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

R Arvindren has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	83% of cases	Mohamed Faizel Ahmed v Public Prosecutor: Drug Consumption, Possession, and Appeal(Oct 2023) PP v Soo Cheow Wee: Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offenders for Voluntarily Causing Hurt and Criminal Intimidation(Jul 2023) Sakthivel Sivasurian v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision on Bail Revocation for Breaching Curfew(Jul 2023)
TSMP Law Corporation	1 cases	17% of cases	Marchmont Pte Ltd v Campbell Hospitality Pte Ltd: Striking Out Notice of Appeal(Sep 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of R Arvindren's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	33%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of R Arvindren's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	24,000.00	24,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Marchmont Pte Ltd v Campbell Hospitality Pte Ltd: Striking Out Notice of Appeal 25 Sep 2024 Wang Cuirong (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	25 Sep 2024	Wang Cuirong (Respondent, Defendant): Application to strike out the Notice of Appeal dismissed with costs.Application to strike out the Notice of Appeal dismissed with costs fixed at $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), inclusive of disbursements, on a standard basis.
2	Mohamed Faizel Ahmed v Public Prosecutor: Drug Consumption, Possession, and Appeal 02 Oct 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Oct 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction was dismissed.
3	PP v Soo Cheow Wee: Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offenders for Voluntarily Causing Hurt and Criminal Intimidation 30 Jul 2023 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	30 Jul 2023	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
4	Sakthivel Sivasurian v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision on Bail Revocation for Breaching Curfew 04 Jul 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 Jul 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the application for criminal revision.
5	Ahmad Danial v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against DNATA for Murder Charge 12 Apr 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	12 Apr 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's position to seek a discharge not amounting to an acquittal was upheld.
6	Neo Chuan Sheng v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving, Road Traffic Act Appeal 17 May 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	17 May 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the disqualification order was dismissed.