R Dilip Kumar

R Dilip Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and guarantee. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 56 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Registration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale in lieu of partition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common intention constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy in Common	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mandatory Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	R Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

R Dilip Kumar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gavan Law Practice LLC	7 cases	100% of cases	Yap Shiaw Wei v RHB Bank Bhd: Bankruptcy Application & Interim Order for Voluntary Arrangement(Sep 2024) 2253 Apparel Inc v Medico Titan Pte Ltd: Contract Formation, Misrepresentation, Unjust Enrichment, Conspiracy(Apr 2023) Goh Yee Lan Coreena v P & P Security Services: Work Injury Compensation Act Appeal(Jul 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of R Dilip Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	43%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of R Dilip Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	152,759.04	38,189.764 cases	4
USD	358,000.00	358,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yap Shiaw Wei v RHB Bank Bhd: Bankruptcy Application & Interim Order for Voluntary Arrangement 09 Sep 2024 Yap Shiaw Wei (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	09 Sep 2024	Yap Shiaw Wei (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the decision of the learned Assistant Registrar Tan Ee Kuan dismissing an application by the appellant in HC/OSB 47/2024 for an interim order pursuant to Part 14 of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (2020 Rev Ed) (the “IRDA”) in order to facilitate consideration of a proposed voluntary arrangement was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2253 Apparel Inc v Medico Titan Pte Ltd: Contract Formation, Misrepresentation, Unjust Enrichment, Conspiracy 18 Apr 2023 2253 Apparel Inc (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Apr 2023	2253 Apparel Inc (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs awarded to the defendant.
3	Goh Yee Lan Coreena v P & P Security Services: Work Injury Compensation Act Appeal 21 Jul 2016 P & P Security Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Jul 2016	P & P Security Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the assessment has the effect of an order for payment under the WICA, and the amount of compensation in the assessment was deemed payable as of 2 April 2013. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
4	Su Emmanuel v Emmanuel Priya: Equitable Accounting & Tenancy in Common Dispute 18 May 2016 Emmanuel Priya Ethel Anne (Respondent)Partial	18 May 2016	Emmanuel Priya Ethel Anne (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe order declaring Emmanuel Priya Ethel Anne beneficially entitled to 70% of the property was set aside. She is entitled to 49% of the property and reimbursement of $74,586.77 from Su Emmanuel for mortgage payments made on Su's behalf.
5	Viknesh Dairy Farm v Balakrishnan: Mandatory Injunction, Fraud, Agency, and Earth Dumping Dispute 27 Jan 2015 BES Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 Jan 2015	BES Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application against the third defendant for a mandatory injunction is dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Sheagar v Belfield: Guarantee, Moneylending Act, Business Registration Act, International Comity 18 May 2014 Belfield International (HongKong) Ltd (Respondent)Won	18 May 2014	Belfield International (HongKong) Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and the Respondent was entitled to its costs of the appeal, fixed at $15,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Belfield International v Sheagar: Guarantee, Loan Agreement & Moneylenders Act 03 Oct 2013 Belfield International (Hong Kong) Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	03 Oct 2013	Belfield International (Hong Kong) Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of US$358,000, with contractual interest at 7% per annum on US$358,000 from 8 April 2011 until the date of payment.