R Doraisamy

R Doraisamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in commercial fraud and property law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

R Doraisamy has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Metal Commodities Trading	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Interpleader Relief	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Housing Developers Rules	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sale and purchase of property	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Doraisamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

R Doraisamy has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramdas & Wong	1 cases	50% of cases	Harris Hakim v Allgreen Properties: Forfeiture Clause & Developer's Rights in Property Sale Default(Sep 2001)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	1 cases	50% of cases	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Stay of Proceedings for Non-Existent Metal Cargoes(Nov 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of R Doraisamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.5 parties avg	5.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of R Doraisamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	41,659.20	41,659.201 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Stay of Proceedings for Non-Existent Metal Cargoes 06 Nov 2002 Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	06 Nov 2002	Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application for stay of proceedings dismissedFujitrans' application for a stay of proceedings regarding the Schedule 3 claim was dismissed.
2	Harris Hakim v Allgreen Properties: Forfeiture Clause & Developer's Rights in Property Sale Default 12 Sep 2001 Allgreen Properties Ltd (Respondent)Lost	12 Sep 2001	Allgreen Properties Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Allgreen was ordered to refund the balance of $41,659.20 to Mr. Hakim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).