R Govin

R Govin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in shipping and admiralty and maritime law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

R Govin has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and shipping.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Shipping	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Products Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Collision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Loss	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Voyage Charterparty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wire Rope Failure Analysis	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Engineering Consultancy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Charterparty Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Govin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

R Govin has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gurbani & Co LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	POS Maritime NX S.A. v Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11: Collision, Time-Bar & Single Liability Principle(Feb 2021)
Gurbani & Co.	1 cases	33% of cases	Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd v Asia Star: Breach of Charterparty & Damages for Failure to Provide Suitable Vessel(Apr 2009)
Gurbani and Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Sin Leng Industries v Ong Chai Teck: Amendment of Claim, Manufacturing Defects & Crane Wire Rope Failure(Feb 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of R Govin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of R Govin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	POS Maritime NX S.A. v Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11: Collision, Time-Bar & Single Liability Principle 21 Feb 2021 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11 (IMO No. 9018359) (Defendant)Won	21 Feb 2021	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11 (IMO No. 9018359) (Defendant): Question answered in the negativeThe court determined that the Defendant is not able to rely on or raise the ‘single liability principle’ in diminution and/or reduction of the Plaintiff’s claim in this action in circumstances where the Defendant’s counterclaim against the Plaintiff is time-barred.
2	Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd v Asia Star: Breach of Charterparty & Damages for Failure to Provide Suitable Vessel 16 Apr 2009 Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	16 Apr 2009	Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowedPlaintiff's appeal allowed. Damages to be calculated based on the ordinary measure of damages in a non-shipment case. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Sin Leng Industries v Ong Chai Teck: Amendment of Claim, Manufacturing Defects & Crane Wire Rope Failure 13 Feb 2006 Sin Leng Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Feb 2006	Sin Leng Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the third defendant was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.