R Raj Singam

R Raj Singam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

R Raj Singam has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Forum conveniens	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

R Raj Singam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Hamzah Bin Mohd Noor v Tunku Ibrahim Ismail: Forum Non Conveniens in Contract Dispute(Sep 2001) Datuk Hamzah v Tunku Ibrahim: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings(Sep 2001)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	33% of cases	Tan Soan Lian v Edwin Lee Yong Chuan: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Divorce(Jun 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of R Raj Singam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of R Raj Singam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000,000.00	2,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hamzah Bin Mohd Noor v Tunku Ibrahim Ismail: Forum Non Conveniens in Contract Dispute 26 Sep 2001 Tunku Ibrahim Ismail Ibni Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (Respondent, Defendant)Won	26 Sep 2001	Tunku Ibrahim Ismail Ibni Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (Respondent, Defendant): Stay of Proceedings GrantedThe defendant's application for a stay of proceedings based on forum non conveniens was granted.
2	Datuk Hamzah v Tunku Ibrahim: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 26 Sep 2001 Tunku Ibrahim Ismail Ibni Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (Respondent, Defendant)Won	26 Sep 2001	Tunku Ibrahim Ismail Ibni Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (Respondent, Defendant): Stay of proceedings grantedThe defendant's application for a stay of proceedings was granted, with the court finding Malaysia to be the more appropriate forum.
3	Tan Soan Lian v Edwin Lee Yong Chuan: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Divorce 14 Jun 2000 Tan Soan Lian (Petitioner, Respondent)Partial	14 Jun 2000	Tan Soan Lian (Petitioner, Respondent): Orders of the District Court varied regarding division of matrimonial assetsPetitioner to receive $2 million as her share of the property at Block 48 Henley Court, #06-04 Astrid Meadows, Coronation Road West, Singapore 269263. Petitioner to receive 25% of the value of other assets. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)