Rabi Ahmad

Rabi Ahmad is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and corporate law. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss Principle	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of statutory duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Equitable jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rabi Ahmad has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rabi Ahmad has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rabi Ahmad and Co	2 cases	50% of cases	Jenton Overseas Investment v Townsing: Director's Duties & Undue Preference(Feb 2006) Tan Wai Kok v Hart Engineering: Building Subcontract Dispute over Defective Works and Wrongful Deductions(Nov 2005)
Rabi Ahmad & Co	1 cases	25% of cases	Townsing v Jenton: Director's Fiduciary Duty & Company's Reflective Loss(Mar 2007)
PK Wong & Advani	1 cases	25% of cases	Singapore Insulating Glass v Newspaper Seng: Breach of Contract & Land Sale Consent(May 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rabi Ahmad's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rabi Ahmad's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
NZD	2,677,303.00	2,677,303.001 cases	1
SGD	349,219.48	349,219.481 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Townsing v Jenton: Director's Fiduciary Duty & Company's Reflective Loss 11 Mar 2007 Jenton Overseas Investment Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Won	11 Mar 2007	Jenton Overseas Investment Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; appeal dismissed with costs.
2	Jenton Overseas Investment v Townsing: Director's Duties & Undue Preference 23 Feb 2006 Jenton Overseas Investment Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	23 Feb 2006	Jenton Overseas Investment Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment awarded to the plaintiff for NZD 2,677,303 with interest at 6% per annum from 2004-06-04. The currency is New Zealand Dollar (NZD) as the claim is for funds transferred from a New Zealand bank account.
3	Tan Wai Kok v Hart Engineering: Building Subcontract Dispute over Defective Works and Wrongful Deductions 15 Nov 2005 Hart Engineering (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Partial	15 Nov 2005	Hart Engineering (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in partCounterclaim allowed in part in the amount of $349,219.48 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Singapore Insulating Glass v Newspaper Seng: Breach of Contract & Land Sale Consent 19 May 2000 Newspaper Seng Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 May 2000	Newspaper Seng Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedThe defendant's counterclaim for a declaration that the sale agreement had become null and void was allowed.