Rachel Loke Jia Min

Rachel Loke Jia Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rachel Loke Jia Min has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in admiralty and maritime law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rachel Loke Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rachel Loke Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rachel Loke Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rachel Loke Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rachel Loke Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Rachel Loke Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rachel Loke Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rachel Loke Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rachel Loke Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rachel Loke Jia Min has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Resource Law LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Anglo-American Corp v London Steam-ship: Striking Out Claims for Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation(Sep 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rachel Loke Jia Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rachel Loke Jia Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Anglo-American Corp v London Steam-ship: Striking Out Claims for Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation 10 Sep 2018 Richard Ian Lovell (Respondent)Won	10 Sep 2018	Richard Ian Lovell (Respondent): WonThe claim in fraudulent misrepresentation against D4 is struck out.