Rachel Low Tze-Lynn

Rachel Low Tze-Lynn is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and costs. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 57% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Procedural fairness	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Due Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business interruption policies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Korean Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rachel Low Tze-Lynn has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rachel Low LLC	4 cases	57% of cases	QBE Insurance v Relax Beach: COVID-19, Business Interruption, & Insurance Claim Notification(Dec 2023) CNA v CNB: Costs Award in SICC Arbitration - Allocation of Pre- and Post-Transfer Costs(Aug 2023) CNA v CNB: Setting Aside Arbitral Award Based on Jurisdictional Challenge and Fiduciary Duty Breach(May 2023)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	14% of cases	Bunge SA v Shrikant Bhasi: Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens & Contractual Interpretation(Sep 2020)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	14% of cases	China Machine v Jaguar Energy: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Feb 2020)
Tham Lijing LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Crest Capital v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Consequential Orders and Costs After Appeal(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rachel Low Tze-Lynn's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 4 (57%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.9 parties avg	3.9	71%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2021	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	34.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rachel Low Tze-Lynn's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Partial	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	470,863.15	156,954.383 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	QBE Insurance v Relax Beach: COVID-19, Business Interruption, & Insurance Claim Notification 20 Dec 2023 MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Appellant)Lost	20 Dec 2023	MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Appellant): Costs awarded to RespondentAppellants to pay respondent costs of S$40,000 for CA 3 and OA 18, and disbursements amounting to S$4,629.30. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CNA v CNB: Costs Award in SICC Arbitration - Allocation of Pre- and Post-Transfer Costs 01 Aug 2023 CNE (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Aug 2023	CNE (Plaintiff): Costs to be paid to DefendantsCNE is to pay 25% of the pre-transfer and post-transfer costs and disbursements to the Defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	CNA v CNB: Setting Aside Arbitral Award Based on Jurisdictional Challenge and Fiduciary Duty Breach 01 May 2023 CNE (Plaintiff)Lost	01 May 2023	CNE (Plaintiff): Application DismissedCNE's application to set aside the First Partial Award and Second Partial Award was dismissed.
4	COD v COE: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 24 May 2022 COD (Applicant)Lost	24 May 2022	COD (Applicant): Application DismissedCOD's application to set aside the final award was dismissed in its entirety.
5	Crest Capital v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Consequential Orders and Costs After Appeal 23 May 2021 Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant)Partial	23 May 2021	Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; not liable for original judgment debt. Respondents to pay costs fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements for the appeal.
6	Bunge SA v Shrikant Bhasi: Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens & Contractual Interpretation 29 Sep 2020 Grains and Industrial Products Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	29 Sep 2020	Grains and Industrial Products Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; claims to be heard in Singapore (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	China Machine v Jaguar Energy: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 27 Feb 2020 China Machine New Energy Corporation (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	27 Feb 2020	China Machine New Energy Corporation (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedCMNC's appeal to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.