Rahayu Binte Mahzam

Rahayu Binte Mahzam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in corporate law and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and business litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sponsorship Agreement	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rahayu Binte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rahayu Binte Mahzam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Heng Leong & Srinivasan	2 cases	100% of cases	Singapore Tourism Board v Children’s Media Ltd: Quistclose Trust & Sponsorship Sum Refund(Aug 2010) Maxz Universal v Lian: Breach of Director's Duties & Conflict of Interest in Company Financial Disputes(Feb 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rahayu Binte Mahzam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rahayu Binte Mahzam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,661,092.07	3,330,546.042 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Tourism Board v Children’s Media Ltd: Quistclose Trust & Sponsorship Sum Refund 12 Aug 2010 Srinivasan s/o V Namasivayam (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	12 Aug 2010	Srinivasan s/o V Namasivayam (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; judgment entered against the defendant in the sum of $6,661,092.07, including sponsorship sums, wasted man-hour costs, and other payments. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Maxz Universal v Lian: Breach of Director's Duties & Conflict of Interest in Company Financial Disputes 25 Feb 2010 Lian Hwee Choo, Phebe (Defendant)Won	25 Feb 2010	Lian Hwee Choo, Phebe (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claims were dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.