Rahayu bte Mahzam

Rahayu bte Mahzam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and trust law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rahayu bte Mahzam has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rahayu bte Mahzam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Rahayu bte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Rahayu bte Mahzam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rahayu bte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rahayu bte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rahayu bte Mahzam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rahayu bte Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rahayu bte Mahzam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rahayu bte Mahzam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Heng Leong & Srinivasan	1 cases	50% of cases	Chiang Sing Jeong v Treasure Resort: Shareholding Dispute & Express Trust Claim(Jul 2013)
Heong Leong & Srinivasan	1 cases	50% of cases	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Minority Oppression & Share Dilution(Sep 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rahayu bte Mahzam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.3
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	110.0 parties avg	10.0	50%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2013	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rahayu bte Mahzam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chiang Sing Jeong v Treasure Resort: Shareholding Dispute & Express Trust Claim 04 Jul 2013 Lim Chong Poon (Defendant)Won	04 Jul 2013	Lim Chong Poon (Defendant): Claim AllowedEstablished a prima facie case that there was a completely constituted trust for value in his favour, the existence of which was acknowledged by Seeto and Rodney on numerous occasions. Under that trust, he was entitled to 25% of TR’s shareholding subject to a cap of $10m on the paid-up capital of TR.
2	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Minority Oppression & Share Dilution 07 Sep 2010 Kok Lan Choo (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Sep 2010	Kok Lan Choo (Plaintiff): First Rights Issue struck down; buy-out of shares orderedFirst Rights Issue struck down; buy-out of shares ordered at the higher of their value immediately prior to the First Rights Issue or the current value. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.