Rahayu Mahzam

Rahayu Mahzam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and misrepresentation. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rahayu Mahzam has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Rahayu Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rahayu Mahzam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rahayu Mahzam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rahayu Mahzam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rahayu Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rahayu Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rahayu Mahzam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rahayu Mahzam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rahayu Mahzam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Heng Leong & Srinivasan	2 cases	100% of cases	Children's Media Ltd v Singapore Tourism Board: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Lifting the Corporate Veil(Nov 2008) Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction v Ssangyong: SOP Act Adjudication & Natural Justice(Sep 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rahayu Mahzam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rahayu Mahzam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Children's Media Ltd v Singapore Tourism Board: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Lifting the Corporate Veil 13 Nov 2008 Anthony David Hollingsworth (Appellant)Lost	13 Nov 2008	Anthony David Hollingsworth (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction v Ssangyong: SOP Act Adjudication & Natural Justice 23 Sep 2008 Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (Respondent)Lost	23 Sep 2008	Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (Respondent): LostApplication to set aside the Adjudication Determination was dismissed.