Raheja Binte Jamaludin

Raheja Binte Jamaludin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and building and construction contracts. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Automobile Insurance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Lump sum contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raheja Binte Jamaludin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Raheja Binte Jamaludin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Abdul Rahman Law Corporation	2 cases	67% of cases	Sulaiman bin Mohd Hassan v Public Prosecutor: Plying for Hire & Motor Vehicle Insurance(Jun 2021) Mohammad Azli v PP: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment(Apr 2020)
Eldan Law LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Terrenus Energy v Attika Interior: Construction Delay & Defect Dispute(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Raheja Binte Jamaludin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Raheja Binte Jamaludin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,020,902.70	3,020,902.701 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Terrenus Energy v Attika Interior: Construction Delay & Defect Dispute 26 Nov 2023 Attika Interior + MEP Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	26 Nov 2023	Attika Interior + MEP Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim partially allowedCounterclaim partially allowed; balance of contract sum awarded, subject to deductions. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Sulaiman bin Mohd Hassan v Public Prosecutor: Plying for Hire & Motor Vehicle Insurance 01 Jun 2021 Sulaiman bin Mohd Hassan (Appellant)Lost	01 Jun 2021	Sulaiman bin Mohd Hassan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
3	Mohammad Azli v PP: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment 22 Apr 2020 Roszaidi bin Osman (Appellant)Partial	22 Apr 2020	Roszaidi bin Osman (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; issue of sentence remittedRoszaidi's appeal against conviction was dismissed, but the issue of whether he qualified for alternative sentencing was remitted to the Judge.