Rai Vijay Kumar

Rai Vijay Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and director's duties. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fiduciary duties and director's duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Overcharging	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sealing orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rai Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rai Vijay Kumar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Arbiters Inc Law Corporation	3 cases	75% of cases	Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph: Legal Costs, Contentious Business Agreements, and Overcharging(Dec 2024) Wee Ewe Seng v True Yoga: Breach of Employment Contract & Fiduciary Duty(Jul 2023) True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Director's Duties, Breach of Contract, and Wrongful Termination(Jul 2022)
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	True Yoga & Ors v Wee Ewe Seng: Application to Seal Court Papers for Breach of Fiduciary Duties(Jul 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rai Vijay Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rai Vijay Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	89,660.70	29,886.903 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph: Legal Costs, Contentious Business Agreements, and Overcharging 04 Dec 2024 Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (Appellant, Applicant)Partial	04 Dec 2024	Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, with an uplift of $27,000 for professional fees and disbursements.
2	Wee Ewe Seng v True Yoga: Breach of Employment Contract & Fiduciary Duty 25 Jul 2023 Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John (Appellant)Lost	25 Jul 2023	Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in its entirety.
3	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Director's Duties, Breach of Contract, and Wrongful Termination 04 Jul 2022 Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John (Defendant)Partial	04 Jul 2022	Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on unpaid salaryJudgment for Defendant on unpaid salary for the period of 1 January 2018 to 9 May 2018 at the rate of $22,500 per month. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	True Yoga & Ors v Wee Ewe Seng: Application to Seal Court Papers for Breach of Fiduciary Duties 24 Jul 2019 Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng (Defendant)Won	24 Jul 2019	Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication to seal the papers in Summons No 3470 of 2019 dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).