Raj Mannar

Raj Mannar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and contempt of court. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Raj Mannar has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and employment law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Kompetenz-Kompetenz	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stare Decisis	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Courts and Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Mannar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Raj Mannar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Peter Low LLC	4 cases	80% of cases	Higgins v Mulacek: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty in Aircraft Management(Sep 2016) Sim Chay Koon v NTUC Income: Upholding Arbitration Agreements in Employment Disputes(Aug 2015) Sim Chay Koon v NTUC Income: Stay of Action for Arbitration under Arbitration Act(Feb 2015)
Peter Low & Choo LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Peter Low LLC v Higgins: Ex Parte Order, Stare Decisis & Joint Tenancy Interest(Nov 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Raj Mannar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.3 parties avg	4.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Raj Mannar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	120,000.00	60,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Peter Low LLC v Higgins: Ex Parte Order, Stare Decisis & Joint Tenancy Interest 12 Nov 2017 Peter Low LLC (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Nov 2017	Peter Low LLC (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Plaintiff's application for an order that the Defendant’s interest in an immovable property be attached and taken in execution under a writ of seizure and sale was dismissed.
2	Higgins v Mulacek: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty in Aircraft Management 25 Sep 2016 Danial Patrick Higgins (Plaintiff, Defendant by counterclaim)Lost	25 Sep 2016	Danial Patrick Higgins (Plaintiff, Defendant by counterclaim): Claim DismissedClaim for breach of contract dismissed.
3	Sim Chay Koon v NTUC Income: Upholding Arbitration Agreements in Employment Disputes 19 Aug 2015 TAY KENG HONG (Appellant)Lost	19 Aug 2015	TAY KENG HONG (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Sim Chay Koon v NTUC Income: Stay of Action for Arbitration under Arbitration Act 09 Feb 2015 SIM CHAY KOON (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	09 Feb 2015	SIM CHAY KOON (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to stay the action in favour of arbitration was dismissed.
5	Attorney-General v Au Wai Pang: Scandalising Contempt and Freedom of Speech 20 Jan 2015 Au Wai Pang (Respondent)Lost	20 Jan 2015	Au Wai Pang (Respondent): Guilty of scandalising contempt in respect of the First ArticleThe Respondent was found guilty of scandalising contempt in respect of the First Article.