Raj Palaniappan

Raj Palaniappan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raj Palaniappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Raj Palaniappan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Orient Centre Investments v Societe Generale: Striking Out Claim for Misrepresentation & Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Sep 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Raj Palaniappan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Raj Palaniappan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Orient Centre Investments v Societe Generale: Striking Out Claim for Misrepresentation & Breach of Fiduciary Duty 18 Sep 2006 Teo Song Kwang alias Richard (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Sep 2006	Teo Song Kwang alias Richard (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision to strike out portions of the claim was dismissed.