Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair

Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and contract law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pre-judgment interest	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Signage Works	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hot-Dip Galvanisation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statement of Final Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajan Nair & Partners	3 cases	75% of cases	Janardana Jayasankarr v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Domestic Helper(Aug 2016) Longyuan-Arrk v Show and Tell: Breach of Contract, Defamation, and Signage Installation Dispute(Aug 2013) Tan Lai Kiat v PP: Criminal Revision for Illegal Lottery Scheme Sentence(May 2010)
M/s Rajan Nair & Partners	1 cases	25% of cases	Tentat Singapore v Win Bo: Recovery of Payments & Counterclaim for Project Failure(Sep 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajan s/o Sankaran Nair's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	105,566.55	52,783.282 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Janardana Jayasankarr v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Domestic Helper 03 Aug 2016 Janardana Jayasankarr (Appellant)Lost	03 Aug 2016	Janardana Jayasankarr (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence of 14 weeks' imprisonment was dismissed.
2	Longyuan-Arrk v Show and Tell: Breach of Contract, Defamation, and Signage Installation Dispute 21 Aug 2013 Show and Tell Productions Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	21 Aug 2013	Show and Tell Productions Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant in the amount of $105,566.55 with interest thereon at the rate of 5.33% per annum from the date of the Plaintiff’s writ of summons in Suit 81 to the date of payment. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Tentat Singapore v Win Bo: Recovery of Payments & Counterclaim for Project Failure 22 Sep 2010 Win Bo Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	22 Sep 2010	Win Bo Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim is dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Tan Lai Kiat v PP: Criminal Revision for Illegal Lottery Scheme Sentence 06 May 2010 Tan Lai Kiat (Petitioner)Won	06 May 2010	Tan Lai Kiat (Petitioner): Petition AllowedThe petition was allowed, the Warrant of Arrest was quashed, and the aggregate fine for the two CGHA charges was reduced to $92,542.