Rajaram Ramiah

Rajaram Ramiah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and contract law. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Termination	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Attendance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rajaram Ramiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rajaram Ramiah has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
RHTLaw Asia LLP	3 cases	60% of cases	Uday Mehra v L Capital: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy(Jan 2022) Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract, Specific Performance & Termination(Jun 2021) Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Pleadings, Rules of Court, Witness Attendance(Jul 2020)
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Aircraft Purchase Agreement Dispute(Apr 2019)
Wee Ramayah & Partners	1 cases	20% of cases	Citrus World Inc v Neotrade Marketing: Wrongful Termination of Distributorship Agreement(Dec 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajaram Ramiah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	80%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajaram Ramiah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Uday Mehra v L Capital: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy 27 Jan 2022 Uday Mehra (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jan 2022	Uday Mehra (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedAll claims made by the plaintiff were dismissed.
2	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract, Specific Performance & Termination 13 Jun 2021 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	13 Jun 2021	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Pleadings, Rules of Court, Witness Attendance 15 Jul 2020 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant)Lost	15 Jul 2020	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant): Application deniedDefendant's arguments against providing further particulars and bifurcating the trial were rejected. Costs to be assessed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Aircraft Purchase Agreement Dispute 29 Apr 2019 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant)Won	29 Apr 2019	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant): Default judgment set asideThe defendant's application to set aside the default judgment was allowed.
5	Citrus World Inc v Neotrade Marketing: Wrongful Termination of Distributorship Agreement 29 Dec 2000 Neotrade Marketing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Dec 2000	Neotrade Marketing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for wrongful termination of distributorship agreement was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).