Rajendran Kumaresan

Rajendran Kumaresan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and unlawful assembly. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dividends	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leasing Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajendran Kumaresan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rajendran Kumaresan has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Central Chambers Law Corporation	5 cases	56% of cases	Sandz Solutions v Strategic Worldwide: Dividends Dispute & Unwinding of Lexicon SPA(May 2014) Strategic Worldwide Assets Ltd v Sandz Solutions: Dividend Claim & Conspiracy(Aug 2013) Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order Due to Breach and Mistake(May 2010)
Central Chambers Law Corp	1 cases	11% of cases	Excalibur Land v Win-Win Aluminium: Set-off Agreement & Payment Obligations Dispute(Feb 2011)
Central Chambers Law Corpn	1 cases	11% of cases	PP v Sufian bin Nordin: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly, and Penal Code Interpretation(Mar 2010)
WT Woon & Co	1 cases	11% of cases	Thongthot Yordsa-Art v PP: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object & Murder(Jul 2002)
W T Woon & Co	1 cases	11% of cases	PP v Thongthot Yordsa-Art: Unlawful Assembly & Murder under Penal Code s 149(Feb 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajendran Kumaresan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 6 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	11%
Lost	54.7 parties avg	4.7	56%
Neutral	17.0 parties avg	7.0	11%
Won	25.3 parties avg	5.3	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2010	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2014	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajendran Kumaresan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(11%)	11%
Lost	5(56%)	56%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Won	2(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	190,214.10	31,702.356 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sandz Solutions v Strategic Worldwide: Dividends Dispute & Unwinding of Lexicon SPA 20 May 2014 Tan Choon Wee (Respondent)Dismissed	20 May 2014	Tan Choon Wee (Respondent): Counterclaim DismissedThe Judge’s decision dismissing the Appellants’ conspiracy counterclaim is upheld. We make no order as to the costs of the Appellants’ counterclaim. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Strategic Worldwide Assets Ltd v Sandz Solutions: Dividend Claim & Conspiracy 25 Aug 2013 Tan Choon Wee (Third Party, Defendant)Neutral	25 Aug 2013	Tan Choon Wee (Third Party, Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendants shall also pay the costs of the third parties. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	Excalibur Land v Win-Win Aluminium: Set-off Agreement & Payment Obligations Dispute 20 Feb 2011 Leck Kim Koon (Defendant)Lost	20 Feb 2011	Leck Kim Koon (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; the sum of $94,107.05 which is the balance amount on the progress payments due upon the repudiation. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order Due to Breach and Mistake 02 May 2010 Yeo Boong Hua (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	02 May 2010	Yeo Boong Hua (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedPlaintiffs’ appeals were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	PP v Sufian bin Nordin: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly, and Penal Code Interpretation 09 Mar 2010 Luo Weiqiang Jason (Defendant)Lost	09 Mar 2010	Luo Weiqiang Jason (Defendant): Imprisonment and CaningSentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and ten strokes of the cane.
6	Wing Hak Man v Bio-Treat Technology: Forum Non Conveniens & Conspiracy 28 Sep 2008 Kwok Chi-Shing (Defendant)Won	28 Sep 2008	Kwok Chi-Shing (Defendant): Stay Application AllowedStay application allowed with costs fixed at $2000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Orix Capital Ltd v Symrise Holding Pte Ltd: Leasing Dispute & Fraud Allegations 27 May 2008 Symrise Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 May 2008	Symrise Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Symrise Pte Ltd; Orix's claim is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Thongthot Yordsa-Art v PP: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object & Murder 09 Jul 2002 Thongthot Yordsa-Art (Appellant)Lost	09 Jul 2002	Thongthot Yordsa-Art (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
9	PP v Thongthot Yordsa-Art: Unlawful Assembly & Murder under Penal Code s 149 24 Feb 2002 Thongthot Yordsa-Art (Defendant)Lost	24 Feb 2002	Thongthot Yordsa-Art (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was convicted of the crime.