Rajinder Singh

Rajinder Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and negligence. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rajinder Singh has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Apportionment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Motor Vehicle Accident Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajinder Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rajinder Singh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	50% of cases	Yang Xi Na v Lim Chong Hong: Determining Liability in a Collision with a Parked Vehicle(May 2006)
B Rao & K S Rajah	1 cases	50% of cases	Teo Eng Chuan v Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay: Appeal on Damages Assessment under Supreme Court of Judicature Act(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajinder Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajinder Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yang Xi Na v Lim Chong Hong: Determining Liability in a Collision with a Parked Vehicle 30 May 2006 Yang Xi Na (Plaintiff)Won	30 May 2006	Yang Xi Na (Plaintiff): Judgment against defendantsJudgment for the plaintiff against the defendants. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Teo Eng Chuan v Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay: Appeal on Damages Assessment under Supreme Court of Judicature Act 07 Oct 2003 Teo Eng Chuan (Respondent, Appellant)Neutral	07 Oct 2003	Teo Eng Chuan (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal not requiring leaveMotion to strike out the notice of appeal was dismissed; leave to appeal was not required. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.