Rajiv Nair

Rajiv Nair is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 57% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rajiv Nair has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied term	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Warranty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Put Option	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interrogatories	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajiv Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rajiv Nair has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok	3 cases	43% of cases	Tullett Prebon v Spring: Interrogatories, Confidentiality, and Freedom of Speech(May 2007) CDIB Venture Investment v Soeryadjaya: Put Option Dispute in Share Purchase Agreement(Sep 2003) Rafiq Jumabhoy v Scotts Investments: Retrospective Leave for Counterclaim in Compulsory Liquidation(May 2003)
GKS Law LLC	2 cases	29% of cases	Seah v Connectus: Winding Up Application Based on Insolvency and Just & Equitable Grounds(Sep 2019) APBA Pte Ltd v Seah Shiang Ping: Quorum Requirements & Director Removal in Shareholder Dispute(Sep 2019)
KSCGP Juris LLP	1 cases	14% of cases	Moh Tai Siang v Moh Tai Tong: Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust & Undue Influence Dispute(Dec 2018)
Shook Lin and Bok	1 cases	14% of cases	De Montfort University v Stanford Training Systems: Stay of Winding-Up Petition Due to Bona Fide Debt Dispute(Oct 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajiv Nair's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 4 (57%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	29%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Withdrawn	23.0 parties avg	3.0	29%
Won	34.2 parties avg	4.2	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajiv Nair's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(25%)	25%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Withdrawn	2(25%)	25%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 111	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Seah v Connectus: Winding Up Application Based on Insolvency and Just & Equitable Grounds 24 Sep 2019 Seah Shiang Ping (Plaintiff)Withdrawn	24 Sep 2019	Seah Shiang Ping (Plaintiff): Application withdrawnSS indicated that she was withdrawing her application to wind up the company. On the first day of the hearing, I granted leave for SS to withdraw her application, subject to the question of costs.
2	APBA Pte Ltd v Seah Shiang Ping: Quorum Requirements & Director Removal in Shareholder Dispute 24 Sep 2019 Seah Chee Wan (Defendant)Won	24 Sep 2019	Seah Chee Wan (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication to remove Seah Chee Wan as director was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Moh Tai Siang v Moh Tai Tong: Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust & Undue Influence Dispute 30 Dec 2018 Moh Tai Siang (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Dec 2018	Moh Tai Siang (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
4	Tullett Prebon v Spring: Interrogatories, Confidentiality, and Freedom of Speech 16 May 2007 Prebon Yamane Financial Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	16 May 2007	Prebon Yamane Financial Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with no order as to costs.
5	De Montfort University v Stanford Training Systems: Stay of Winding-Up Petition Due to Bona Fide Debt Dispute 24 Oct 2005 Stanford Training Systems Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	24 Oct 2005	Stanford Training Systems Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Application to Stay Petition GrantedThe application to stay the winding-up petition was granted.
6	CDIB Venture Investment v Soeryadjaya: Put Option Dispute in Share Purchase Agreement 14 Sep 2003 CDIB Venture Investment (Asia) Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Sep 2003	CDIB Venture Investment (Asia) Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed in respect of the Esplanade shares.
7	Rafiq Jumabhoy v Scotts Investments: Retrospective Leave for Counterclaim in Compulsory Liquidation 19 May 2003 Scotts Investments (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Defendant)Withdrawn	19 May 2003	Scotts Investments (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Defendant): Claim withdrawnScotts Investments withdrew its claim against Rafiq Jumabhoy.