Rajwin Singh Sandhu

Rajwin Singh Sandhu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and criminal law. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated expertise across 59 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	6 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parenting Styles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractors’ duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Subcontracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Claims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defects	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defect liability provisions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Distribution of assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Passing of property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Orders for protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajwin Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rajwin Singh Sandhu has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajwin & Yong LLP	10 cases	83% of cases	WWG v WWH: Appeal for Injunction on Matrimonial Asset Sale in Divorce Proceedings(Jul 2024) Calpeda Asia Pacific v Chew Construction: Subcontract Claims, Defect Damages, Delay, and Contractor Duties(Apr 2023) Rasalingam Letchumee v The Estate of Jaganathan Rajendaran: Proprietary Estoppel & Intestate Succession Dispute(Dec 2022)
Amarjit Sidhu Law Practice	1 cases	8% of cases	Prakash s/o Manikam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt(Jan 2020)
Tactica Law	1 cases	8% of cases	SME Resources v. Koh Xiankai: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Share Ownership Dispute(Feb 2025)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajwin Singh Sandhu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.3 parties avg	2.3	58%
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	42%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajwin Singh Sandhu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(58%)	58%
Won	5(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SME Resources v. Koh Xiankai: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Share Ownership Dispute 23 Feb 2025 SME Resources Pte Ltd (Claimant)Lost	23 Feb 2025	SME Resources Pte Ltd (Claimant): Claim DismissedSME’s claim against Koh was dismissed as time-barred.
2	WWG v WWH: Appeal for Injunction on Matrimonial Asset Sale in Divorce Proceedings 29 Jul 2024 WWG (Appellant)Lost	29 Jul 2024	WWG (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe Wife's appeal for an injunction was dismissed.
3	Calpeda Asia Pacific v Chew Construction: Subcontract Claims, Defect Damages, Delay, and Contractor Duties 17 Apr 2023 Chew Construction & Plumbing Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	17 Apr 2023	Chew Construction & Plumbing Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed; no damages awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Rasalingam Letchumee v The Estate of Jaganathan Rajendaran: Proprietary Estoppel & Intestate Succession Dispute 29 Dec 2022 Rasalingam Letchumee (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	29 Dec 2022	Rasalingam Letchumee (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for proprietary estoppel over the Tanjong Pagar flat and other assets was dismissed.
5	Goh Ngak Eng v Public Prosecutor: Private Sector Corruption & Sentencing Framework under Prevention of Corruption Act 11 Oct 2022 Goh Ngak Eng (Appellant)Lost	11 Oct 2022	Goh Ngak Eng (Appellant): Appeal Dismissed; Sentence EnhancedAppeal dismissed and sentence enhanced to 37 months and three weeks’ imprisonment.
6	VYR v VYS: Appeal Against Magistrate's Decision on Personal Protection Order & Domestic Exclusion Order 24 Aug 2022 VYR (Appellant)Lost	24 Aug 2022	VYR (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the magistrate dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Sheik Parvez v Public Prosecutor: Driving Under Disqualification & Without Insurance 14 Jun 2022 Sheik Parvez Zunuas Bin Shaik Raheem (Appellant)Lost	14 Jun 2022	Sheik Parvez Zunuas Bin Shaik Raheem (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against sentences and disqualification orders dismissed.
8	Seah Han v. Onwards Media Group: Commission Dispute over HBO Asia Contract 15 Jul 2021 Seah Han (Plaintiff)Won	15 Jul 2021	Seah Han (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the plaintiff is entitled to the remainder of his commission, with interest and costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Autoexport & EPZ v TOW77: Appeal on Transfer of District Court Suit for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract 14 Apr 2021 TOW77 Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	14 Apr 2021	TOW77 Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; the respondent was awarded costs of the appeal fixed at $2,500 inclusive of disbursements to be paid by the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Autoexport & EPZ v TOW77: Transfer of Counterclaim Exceeding District Court Limit 25 Jan 2021 TOW77 Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	25 Jan 2021	TOW77 Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe application to transfer the proceedings to the High Court was dismissed.
11	UNQ v UNR: Appeal Against Personal Protection Order in Family Violence Case 23 Nov 2020 UNQ (Appellant)Won	23 Nov 2020	UNQ (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Father's appeal was allowed, and the PPO was set aside. No order as to costs was made.
12	Prakash s/o Manikam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt 07 Jan 2020 Prakash s/o Manikam (Appellant)Won	07 Jan 2020	Prakash s/o Manikam (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the sentence of six months' imprisonment was allowed, and the sentence was substituted with a sentence of two months' imprisonment.