Rakesh Kirpalani

Rakesh Kirpalani is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and corporate notes. Their track record shows a 83.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 83% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debenture	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Notes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Secured Convertible Note	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Rakesh Kirpalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rakesh Kirpalani has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	50% of cases	Pacific Harbor Advisors v Tiny Tantono: Examination of Judgment Debtor & Scope of Questioning(Jan 2015) Silverlink Holdings Ltd v Rockline Ltd: Dispute over Settlement Agreement and Right to Appeal(Jan 2011) Purcell v Singapore Flyer: Director's Removal and Inspection Rights under Companies Act(May 2010)
Drew & Napier LLP	3 cases	50% of cases	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes(Aug 2010) Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Breach of Contract over Refusal to Issue Corporate Notes(Apr 2010) Rockline Ltd v Anil Thadani: Expungement of Evidence and Privilege in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Suit(Sep 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rakesh Kirpalani's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.2
Complex Cases: 5 (83%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	17%
Won	57.4 parties avg	7.4	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2010	35.6 parties avg	5.6
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rakesh Kirpalani's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	5(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	200.00	66.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Pacific Harbor Advisors v Tiny Tantono: Examination of Judgment Debtor & Scope of Questioning 18 Jan 2015 Tiny Tantono (representative of the estate of Lim Susanto, deceased) (Defendant, Judgment Debtor)Won	18 Jan 2015	Tiny Tantono (representative of the estate of Lim Susanto, deceased) (Defendant, Judgment Debtor): Scope of examination limitedThe Judgment Creditor is not permitted to ask questions concerning the historical aspect of the estate of the deceased even if such questions have a nexus to the property that the estate has wheresoever situated.
2	Silverlink Holdings Ltd v Rockline Ltd: Dispute over Settlement Agreement and Right to Appeal 12 Jan 2011 Superon (Respondent)Won	12 Jan 2011	Superon (Respondent): Application DismissedSilverlink's application was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes 25 Aug 2010 Superon (Plaintiff)Partial	25 Aug 2010	Superon (Plaintiff): Nominal damages awardedNominal damages of $100 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Purcell v Singapore Flyer: Director's Removal and Inspection Rights under Companies Act 20 May 2010 Great Singapore Flyer Holding Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	20 May 2010	Great Singapore Flyer Holding Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application against the fourth defendant was dismissed with costs.
5	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Breach of Contract over Refusal to Issue Corporate Notes 25 Apr 2010 Superon International Limited (Plaintiff)Won	25 Apr 2010	Superon International Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court will hear parties as to the appropriate remedies and relief before making any order herein. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Rockline Ltd v Anil Thadani: Expungement of Evidence and Privilege in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Suit 16 Sep 2009 Schroder Asian Property Managers Limited as General Partner of Schroder Asian Properties L.P. (Plaintiff)Won	16 Sep 2009	Schroder Asian Property Managers Limited as General Partner of Schroder Asian Properties L.P. (Plaintiff): Application to expunge documents grantedPlaintiff's application to expunge various documents she claimed to be privileged communication was granted.