Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium

Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Repudiation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Grays LLC	5 cases	83% of cases	PP v Mohamed Aliff: Murder Conviction for Infant's Death Due to Blunt Force Trauma(Nov 2022) Biofuel Industries v. V8 Environmental: Breach of Contract & Damages Dispute(Jun 2018) PP v Mohamad Fadzli & Mohamed Affandi: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2017)
M/s Grays LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	Tentat Singapore v Win Bo: Recovery of Payments & Counterclaim for Project Failure(Sep 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.3 parties avg	2.3	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ramachandran Shiever Subramanium's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,261,942.18	420,647.393 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Mohamed Aliff: Murder Conviction for Infant's Death Due to Blunt Force Trauma 23 Nov 2022 Mohamed Aliff bin Mohamed Yusoff (Defendant)Lost	23 Nov 2022	Mohamed Aliff bin Mohamed Yusoff (Defendant): ConvictionAccused was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
2	Biofuel Industries v. V8 Environmental: Breach of Contract & Damages Dispute 24 Jun 2018 BIOFUEL INDUSTRIES PTE LTD (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	24 Jun 2018	BIOFUEL INDUSTRIES PTE LTD (Appellant, Plaintiff): Nominal damages awardedNominal damages of $1,000 awarded for wrongful termination of the BSA (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	PP v Mohamad Fadzli & Mohamed Affandi: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Sep 2017 MOHAMAD FADZLI BIN AHMAD (Defendant)Lost	25 Sep 2017	MOHAMAD FADZLI BIN AHMAD (Defendant): Guilty of abetting Affandi to traffic DiamorphineFadzli was found guilty of abetting Affandi to have possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
4	Biofuel Industries v V8 Environmental: Biomass Supply Agreement Termination Dispute 27 Jul 2017 BIOFUEL INDUSTRIES PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jul 2017	BIOFUEL INDUSTRIES PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $1,260,942.18 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Devendran v PP: Importation of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Statutory Presumption 04 May 2015 Devendran a/l Supramaniam (Appellant)Lost	04 May 2015	Devendran a/l Supramaniam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppellant's appeal against conviction and sentence for importing diamorphine was dismissed.
6	Tentat Singapore v Win Bo: Recovery of Payments & Counterclaim for Project Failure 22 Sep 2010 Win Bo Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	22 Sep 2010	Win Bo Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim is dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).