Raman Gopalan

Raman Gopalan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and injunctions. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Raman Gopalan has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitrator's Fees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raman Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Raman Gopalan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
G R Law Corporation	3 cases	60% of cases	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Injunction for Arbitrator Fees Dispute(Nov 2008) Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Extension of Time for Appeal Legal Issue(Jun 2008) Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Construction: Application for Extension of Time to Issue Arbitral Award(Apr 2008)
Withers KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Innovative Corp v Ow Chun Ming: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Opportunity(May 2019)
KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Von Roll Asia v Goh Boon Gay: Striking Out Defence for Failure to Disclose Sales Invoices(Apr 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Raman Gopalan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	60%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Raman Gopalan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,000.00	1,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Innovative Corp v Ow Chun Ming: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Opportunity 12 May 2019 Innovative Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	12 May 2019	Innovative Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartClaim allowed in part; an account of profits by the defendants to be determined by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Von Roll Asia v Goh Boon Gay: Striking Out Defence for Failure to Disclose Sales Invoices 26 Apr 2015 Lim Keng Huat (Defendant)Lost	26 Apr 2015	Lim Keng Huat (Defendant): Defence struck outDefence struck out for non-compliance with discovery orders. Ordered to pay costs of $3,000.00 (inclusive of disbursements) to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Injunction for Arbitrator Fees Dispute 09 Nov 2008 Khoo Cheng Neo Norma (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	09 Nov 2008	Khoo Cheng Neo Norma (Defendant, Respondent): Discharge application dismissedApplication to discharge the injunction was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Extension of Time for Appeal Legal Issue 04 Jun 2008 Khoo Cheng Neo Norma (Defendant)Neutral	04 Jun 2008	Khoo Cheng Neo Norma (Defendant): Application dismissedPrayer (i) of Summons 855/08 dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Construction: Application for Extension of Time to Issue Arbitral Award 28 Apr 2008 Anwar Siraj (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	28 Apr 2008	Anwar Siraj (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe defendant's appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against him.