Ramesh Chandr Tiwary

Ramesh Chandr Tiwary is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 26 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 15.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 12% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	26 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 26 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	19 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	18 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	16 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	11 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
False Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Similar fact evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rioting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sex Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intermittent Explosive Disorder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ramesh Chandr Tiwary has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 23 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramesh Tiwary	23 cases	88% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Raj Kumar: Rape & Outrage of Modesty at Southbank Condominium(Oct 2024) Public Prosecutor v DAM: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide, Rioting, Drug Offenses, and Child Abuse(Sep 2023) PP v Hashim: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2023)
Ramesh Tiwary Advocates & Solicitors	2 cases	8% of cases	Public Prosecutor v M Krishnan: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Domestic Violence with Intermittent Explosive Disorder(May 2024) Public Prosecutor v CAX: Sexual Offences Against a Child(Mar 2024)
Messrs Ramesh Tiwary	1 cases	4% of cases	Mohamed Affandi v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Chain of Evidence(Dec 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ramesh Chandr Tiwary's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 3 (12%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	192.2 parties avg	2.2	73%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	4%
Stayed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	4%
Withdrawn	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	15%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2021	72.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	52.2 parties avg	2.2
2023	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ramesh Chandr Tiwary's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	19(73%)	73%
Partial	1(4%)	4%
Stayed	1(4%)	4%
Withdrawn	1(4%)	4%
Won	4(15%)	15%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2021	7 511	Lost: 5 cases (71.4%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 1 cases (14.3%)
2022	5 41	Lost: 4 cases (80.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2023	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Stayed: 1 cases (33.3%)
2024	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 26 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Raj Kumar: Rape & Outrage of Modesty at Southbank Condominium 20 Oct 2024 Raj Kumar s/o Bala (Defendant)Lost	20 Oct 2024	Raj Kumar s/o Bala (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was convicted of rape, outrage of modesty, and harbouring a person who had escaped from a place of safety. He was sentenced to 13 years and four weeks' imprisonment and nine strokes of the cane.
2	Public Prosecutor v M Krishnan: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Domestic Violence with Intermittent Explosive Disorder 14 May 2024 M Krishnan (Defense)Lost	14 May 2024	M Krishnan (Defense): Sentence of 20 years imprisonmentAccused sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment, backdated to the date of his arrest.
3	Public Prosecutor v CAX: Sexual Offences Against a Child 20 Mar 2024 CAX (Defense)Won	20 Mar 2024	CAX (Defense): WonAccused acquitted on all charges.
4	Public Prosecutor v DAM: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide, Rioting, Drug Offenses, and Child Abuse 18 Sep 2023 DAM (Defendant)Lost	18 Sep 2023	DAM (Defendant): Sentenced to imprisonment and caningDefendant sentenced to 21½ years' imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	PP v Hashim: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 11 Jun 2023 Hashim Bin Ismail (Defendant)Stayed	11 Jun 2023	Hashim Bin Ismail (Defendant): Proceedings StayedProceedings against Hashim were stayed pursuant to s 248(2) of the CPC due to his unsound mind.
6	Public Prosecutor v. Mustaqim bin Abdul Kadir: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 15 May 2023 Mustaqim bin Abdul Kadir (Defendant)Lost	15 May 2023	Mustaqim bin Abdul Kadir (Defendant): ConvictionMustaqim was convicted of the charge of trafficking in a controlled drug.
7	PP v Mohamed Ansari: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Oct 2022 Mohamed Ansari bin Mohamed Abdul Aziz (Defendant)Lost	02 Oct 2022	Mohamed Ansari bin Mohamed Abdul Aziz (Defendant): Convicted as chargedAccused convicted of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to death.
8	PP v Muhammad Hakam: Trafficking Cannabis - Sentencing 06 Jul 2022 Muhammad Hakam bin Suliman (Defendant)Lost	06 Jul 2022	Muhammad Hakam bin Suliman (Defendant): Sentence imposedAccused sentenced to 24 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
9	Raj Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Knowledge of Drugs 26 May 2022 Raj Kumar s/o Aiyachami (Appellant)Won	26 May 2022	Raj Kumar s/o Aiyachami (Appellant): Appeal AllowedRaj Kumar's appeal was allowed, and his conviction was set aside.
10	Mohamed Shalleh v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumption of Knowledge 13 Mar 2022 Mohamed Shalleh Bin Abdul Latiff (Appellant)Lost	13 Mar 2022	Mohamed Shalleh Bin Abdul Latiff (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
11	Sanjay Krishnan v Public Prosecutor: Adducing Fresh Evidence in Drug Trafficking Appeal 08 Mar 2022 Sanjay Krishnan (Applicant)Lost	08 Mar 2022	Sanjay Krishnan (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to adduce further evidence was dismissed.
12	BWM v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Sexual Assault by Penetration 15 Aug 2021 BWM (Appellant)Lost	15 Aug 2021	BWM (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence of 20 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane was dismissed.
13	Parthiban v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Importation Conviction and Sentencing 02 Aug 2021 Parthiban a/l Kanapathy (Appellant)Lost	02 Aug 2021	Parthiban a/l Kanapathy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
14	Public Prosecutor v BOX: Sentencing for Sexual Assault and Outrage of Modesty Against Minors 29 Jun 2021 BOX (Defendant)Lost	29 Jun 2021	BOX (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedAccused sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
15	Public Prosecutor v Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 18 May 2021 Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar (Defendant)Won	18 May 2021	Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar (Defendant): AcquittedThe accused was acquitted of the drug trafficking charge.
16	Abdul Karim v Public Prosecutor: Dual Charging Practice under Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Mar 2021 Abdul Karim bin Mohamed Kuppai Khan (Appellant)Lost	29 Mar 2021	Abdul Karim bin Mohamed Kuppai Khan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppellant's appeal against his sentence was dismissed.
17	Amarjeet Singh v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motion, Plea Agreements & Court Jurisdiction 29 Mar 2021 Amarjeet Singh (Applicant)Withdrawn	29 Mar 2021	Amarjeet Singh (Applicant): Application WithdrawnThe applicant withdrew the criminal motion after the court raised concerns about its jurisdictional basis.
18	Public Prosecutor v Sumardi Bin Sjahril Habibie: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Feb 2021 Sumardi Bin Sjahril Habibie (Defendant)Lost	28 Feb 2021	Sumardi Bin Sjahril Habibie (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted of possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
19	Mohamed Shalleh v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Additional Evidence, Knowledge of Drugs 29 Dec 2020 Mohamed Shalleh Bin Abdul Latiff (Appellant)Lost	29 Dec 2020	Mohamed Shalleh Bin Abdul Latiff (Appellant): Original verdict affirmedThe court affirmed its original verdict of guilt.
20	Public Prosecutor v Raj Kumar: Trafficking Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act 14 Jun 2020 Raj Kumar s/o Aiyachami (Defendant)Lost	14 Jun 2020	Raj Kumar s/o Aiyachami (Defendant): ConvictionRaj Kumar was convicted of possession of not less than 1,875.8g of cannabis for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to death.
21	Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nur Azam: Drug Importation & Consumption Sentencing 17 Mar 2020 Muhammad Nur Azam bin Mohamad Indra (Defendant)Lost	17 Mar 2020	Muhammad Nur Azam bin Mohamad Indra (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedSentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane for drug importation and consumption.
22	PP v Andi Ashwar & Ors: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Feb 2019 Andi Ashwar Bin Salihin (Defendant)Lost	26 Feb 2019	Andi Ashwar Bin Salihin (Defendant): LostConvicted as charged.
23	BLV v Public Prosecutor: Adducing Fresh Evidence, Abuse of Process, False Evidence 20 Jan 2019 BLV (Appellant)Lost	20 Jan 2019	BLV (Appellant): Appeal DeniedAppeal denied; original verdict and sentence upheld.
24	Mohamed Affandi v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Chain of Evidence 04 Dec 2018 MOHAMAD FADZLI BIN AHMAD (Appellant)Won	04 Dec 2018	MOHAMAD FADZLI BIN AHMAD (Appellant): Appeal AllowedConviction on Charge A set aside due to failure to establish chain of custody.
25	PP v Zulkarnain: Misuse of Drugs Act Trafficking & Abetment Case 15 Jul 2018 Zulkarnain bin Kemat (Defendant)Partial	15 Jul 2018	Zulkarnain bin Kemat (Defendant): Convicted; sentenced to life imprisonmentZulkarnain was convicted of possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking but avoided the death penalty due to meeting requirements under s 33B(2) of the MDA and receiving a certificate of substantive assistance.
26	Public Prosecutor v Zaini bin Mohamed Noor: Illegally Importing Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Jul 2016 Zaini bin Mohamed Noor (Defendant)Lost	03 Jul 2016	Zaini bin Mohamed Noor (Defendant): Guilty as chargedZaini was found guilty of illegally importing not less than 771.1g of methamphetamine into Singapore.