Ramesh Chandra

Ramesh Chandra is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and road traffic law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and road traffic law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Dividends	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ramesh Chandra has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Leroy & Chandra	3 cases	75% of cases	International Connex Holdings v Chan Shing On: Breach of Directors' Duties in Joint Venture(Dec 2007) PP v Fernandez: Road Traffic Act - Failure to Stop & Removing Vehicle from Accident Scene(Jul 2007) Fernandez Joseph Ferdinent v Public Prosecutor: Road Traffic Offences - Failure to Stop, Render Assistance, and Remove Vehicle(Apr 2007)
Independent Practice	1 cases	25% of cases	Loh Cheng Lee Aaron v Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Winding Up for Cryptocurrency Liabilities under IRDA(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ramesh Chandra's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	33.2 parties avg	3.2
2023	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ramesh Chandra's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Loh Cheng Lee Aaron v Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Winding Up for Cryptocurrency Liabilities under IRDA 09 Nov 2023 Official Receiver (Non-party)Neutral	09 Nov 2023	Official Receiver (Non-party): NeutralOfficial Receiver was a non-party in this case (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	International Connex Holdings v Chan Shing On: Breach of Directors' Duties in Joint Venture 30 Dec 2007 Wealth Resource Enterprise Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Dec 2007	Wealth Resource Enterprise Ltd (Defendant): Claims DismissedClaims against the defendant were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	PP v Fernandez: Road Traffic Act - Failure to Stop & Removing Vehicle from Accident Scene 16 Jul 2007 Fernandez Joseph Ferdinent (Respondent)Lost	16 Jul 2007	Fernandez Joseph Ferdinent (Respondent): Appeal against conviction reinstatedThe Court of Appeal's decision means that the respondent's conviction under sections 84(1) and 84(4) of the Road Traffic Act is reinstated.
4	Fernandez Joseph Ferdinent v Public Prosecutor: Road Traffic Offences - Failure to Stop, Render Assistance, and Remove Vehicle 29 Apr 2007 Fernandez Joseph Ferdinent (Appellant)Partial	29 Apr 2007	Fernandez Joseph Ferdinent (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed in respect of the driving without reasonable consideration charge, the failure to stop charge and the failure to render assistance charge but set aside the conviction and sentence where the removal of vehicle charge was concerned.