Ramesh s/o Selvaraj

Ramesh s/o Selvaraj is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal profession act and disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and legal profession act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Club Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Defamation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Architects, Engineers and Surveyors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liability insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duties and liabilities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Remuneration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service of document	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gross overcharging	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of fidelity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ramesh s/o Selvaraj has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	7 cases	88% of cases	SYT Consultants v QBE Insurance: Professional Indemnity & Breach of Duty Claims(Oct 2022) Law Society v CNH: Disciplinary Proceedings for Sexual Misconduct(May 2022) Law Society of Singapore v CNH: Disciplinary Proceedings & Substituted Service(Sep 2021)
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	13% of cases	Kay Swee Pin v Singapore Island Country Club: Damages for Wrongful Suspension of Club Membership(Aug 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ramesh s/o Selvaraj's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	62.4 parties avg	2.4	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ramesh s/o Selvaraj's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	6(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	89,464.02	12,780.577 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SYT Consultants v QBE Insurance: Professional Indemnity & Breach of Duty Claims 06 Oct 2022 QBE Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	06 Oct 2022	QBE Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff's claim.
2	Law Society v CNH: Disciplinary Proceedings for Sexual Misconduct 18 May 2022 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	18 May 2022	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantThe respondent was ordered to be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors. Costs of OS 3, SUM 1 and the DT proceedings awarded to the Law Society, fixed at $13,000 together with disbursements of $4,464.02 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Law Society of Singapore v CNH: Disciplinary Proceedings & Substituted Service 14 Sep 2021 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	14 Sep 2021	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application allowedApplication for substituted service allowed. Costs of the application to be in the cause. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Law Society v Ang Chin Peng: Disciplinary Action for Gross Overcharging in Estate Matters 25 Nov 2012 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	25 Nov 2012	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantRespondents suspended for three months and ordered to pay costs.
5	Kay Swee Pin v Singapore Island Country Club: Defamation, Justification, and Qualified Privilege 09 Jun 2010 General Committee of the SICC (Defendant)Won	09 Jun 2010	General Committee of the SICC (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	ABZ v Singapore Press Holdings: Defamation, Publication, and Qualified Privilege 11 Aug 2009 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (Defendant)Won	11 Aug 2009	Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was entered in favor of the defendant, Singapore Press Holdings Ltd.
7	Kay Swee Pin v Singapore Island Country Club: Damages for Wrongful Suspension of Club Membership 28 Aug 2008 Singapore Island Country Club (Defendant)Partial	28 Aug 2008	Singapore Island Country Club (Defendant): Partial LossDamages of $72,000 awarded to the plaintiff for deprivation of membership rights and mental distress; claim for aggravated, exemplary, and punitive damages disallowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Kay Swee Pin v SICC: Disciplinary Action Review & Natural Justice 11 Mar 2008 Singapore Island Country Club (Respondent)Lost	11 Mar 2008	Singapore Island Country Club (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the appellant. Suspension order declared invalid. Respondent to refund all sums paid by the appellant and awarded damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.