Ramesh s/o Varathappan

Ramesh s/o Varathappan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in wills and probate and property law. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated expertise across 43 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest in land	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenancy in Common	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unilateral mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discharge Voucher	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intimidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Blackmail	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
CPF Nomination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh s/o Varathappan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ramesh s/o Varathappan has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Surian & Partners	3 cases	38% of cases	Associate Dynamic Builder v Tactic Foundation: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under Security of Payment Act(Jun 2013) Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust Claim, Blackmail, Tort of Intimidation and Harassment(Jan 2013) Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust, Blackmail, and Breach of Contract Claims(Apr 2012)
Tito Isaac & Co LLP	2 cases	25% of cases	GVR Global Pte Ltd v Wayne Burt Pte Ltd: Stay of Winding-Up Order Application(Apr 2020) Wong Chong Hui v Lim Siong Hoe Lawrence: Unilateral Mistake in Contract Law(Mar 2019)
Legal Minds Practice LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	WVD v WUR: Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal Regarding Breach of Fiduciary Duties(Feb 2025)
Straits Law Practice LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	Prakash Devi v Devendra Pratap Singh: Dispute over HDB Flat Beneficial Interest(Mar 2018)
M Rama Law Corporation	1 cases	13% of cases	Leow Li Yoon v Liu Jiu Chang: Validity of CPF Nomination & Mental Capacity(Nov 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ramesh s/o Varathappan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.5
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	38%
Won	511.9 parties avg	11.9	63%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	115.0 parties avg	15.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ramesh s/o Varathappan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Won	5(63%)	63%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WVD v WUR: Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal Regarding Breach of Fiduciary Duties 02 Feb 2025 WVC (Respondent)Won	02 Feb 2025	WVC (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	GVR Global Pte Ltd v Wayne Burt Pte Ltd: Stay of Winding-Up Order Application 29 Apr 2020 M.R.K. Enterprises Private Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Apr 2020	M.R.K. Enterprises Private Ltd (Defendant): Winding-up Order UpheldThe second defendant's winding-up order against the first defendant was upheld.
3	Wong Chong Hui v Lim Siong Hoe Lawrence: Unilateral Mistake in Contract Law 28 Mar 2019 Lim Siong Hoe Lawrence (Respondent)Lost	28 Mar 2019	Lim Siong Hoe Lawrence (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the discharge voucher was valid.
4	Prakash Devi v Devendra Pratap Singh: Dispute over HDB Flat Beneficial Interest 25 Mar 2018 Prakash Devi w/o Durga Singh (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Mar 2018	Prakash Devi w/o Durga Singh (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for 50% beneficial interest in the property was dismissed. The court determined the plaintiff's beneficial interest to be 5.02% based on financial contributions. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Leow Li Yoon v Liu Jiu Chang: Validity of CPF Nomination & Mental Capacity 03 Nov 2015 Leow Li Yoon (Appellant)Won	03 Nov 2015	Leow Li Yoon (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; CPF Nomination Form set aside and CPF monies to be distributed in the manner prescribed in the Intestate Succession Act. Costs of $5,000 ordered against the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Associate Dynamic Builder v Tactic Foundation: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under Security of Payment Act 04 Jun 2013 Tactic Foundation Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	04 Jun 2013	Tactic Foundation Pte Ltd (Defendant): Adjudication Determination UpheldAdjudication determination in its favour for the full amount as claimed in the Payment Claim upheld.
7	Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust Claim, Blackmail, Tort of Intimidation and Harassment 23 Jan 2013 Pang Min Seng (Respondent)Lost	23 Jan 2013	Pang Min Seng (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay $608,700 for the Trust Claim and $50,000 for the Blackmail Claim, with interest at 3% from the date of filing the Writ of Summons, and costs of the appeal, SUM 4377, and the proceedings below. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust, Blackmail, and Breach of Contract Claims 19 Apr 2012 Poh Saipin (Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2012	Poh Saipin (Defendant): Trust Claim DismissedThe claims against the defendant for the Trust Money were dismissed.