Randeep Singh

Randeep Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Randeep Singh has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sanctions Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of disclosure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money-changing and Remittance Businesses Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
United Nations Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Randeep Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Randeep Singh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	6 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Soh Chee Wen: Litigation Privilege in Criminal Proceedings(Sep 2019) PP v Yeo Ek Boon: Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Hurt to a Police Officer(Nov 2017) Muhammad Nur bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Breach of Probation and Reformative Training Eligibility(Nov 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Randeep Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2017	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Randeep Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Soh Chee Wen: Litigation Privilege in Criminal Proceedings 29 Sep 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral	29 Sep 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Ruling ClarifiedThe court clarified the scope of litigation privilege for the prosecution and the approach to cross-examination.
2	PP v Yeo Ek Boon: Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Hurt to a Police Officer 28 Nov 2017 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Applicant)Won	28 Nov 2017	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was increased to ten weeks' imprisonment.
3	Muhammad Nur bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Breach of Probation and Reformative Training Eligibility 27 Nov 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Nov 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was upheld, and the applicant was deemed ineligible for reformative training.
4	Chinpo Shipping v Public Prosecutor: DPRK Sanctions & Remittance Business 11 May 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	11 May 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in respect of the MCRBA Charge.
5	Sim Yeow Kee & Loi Wenda v Public Prosecutor: Corrective Training, Mandatory Aftercare Scheme & Sentencing 28 Sep 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	28 Sep 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially LostThe Public Prosecutor's position was partially rejected as the court allowed Sim's appeal.
6	PP v Tan Thian Earn: Sentencing for Possessing Precursor Chemicals under the Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Apr 2016 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	10 Apr 2016	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal Dismissed