Randhir Ram Chandra

Randhir Ram Chandra is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and valuation. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ship Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Documentary evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Nominal damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Calderbank letter	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Refurbishment Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Randhir Ram Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Randhir Ram Chandra has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haridass Ho and Partners	3 cases	60% of cases	Jet Holding Ltd v Cooper Cameron: Costs Allocation in Negligence & Contract Dispute(Feb 2006) Jet Holding v Cooper Cameron: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Slip Joint Refurbishment(Aug 2005) Icadam Technologies v CAD-IT: Defamation in Metal Stamping Software Industry(Jul 2005)
Haridass Ho & Partners	2 cases	40% of cases	Chaly Chee Kheong Mah v The Liquidators of Baring Futures: Contractual Indemnity & Auditors' Liability(Jul 2003) Bajumi Wahab v Afro-Asia Shipping: Valuation Dispute over Company Assets(May 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Randhir Ram Chandra's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.8
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	45.0 parties avg	5.0	80%
Neutral	113.0 parties avg	13.0	20%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	25.6 parties avg	5.6
2006	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Randhir Ram Chandra's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	2,000,000.00	2,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Jet Holding Ltd v Cooper Cameron: Costs Allocation in Negligence & Contract Dispute 01 Feb 2006 Maurel Et Prom (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Feb 2006	Maurel Et Prom (Plaintiff): Costs Order AgainstSeparate costs order made against the fourth plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Jet Holding v Cooper Cameron: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Slip Joint Refurbishment 21 Aug 2005 Maurel Et Prom (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Aug 2005	Maurel Et Prom (Plaintiff): No locus standiNo locus standi
3	Icadam Technologies v CAD-IT: Defamation in Metal Stamping Software Industry 20 Jul 2005 Tan Chin Yeow Alvin (Defendant)Lost	20 Jul 2005	Tan Chin Yeow Alvin (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Chaly Chee Kheong Mah v The Liquidators of Baring Futures: Contractual Indemnity & Auditors' Liability 06 Jul 2003 Chaly Chee Kheong Mah (Appellant)Lost	06 Jul 2003	Chaly Chee Kheong Mah (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with appellants to pay 2/3 of the costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Bajumi Wahab v Afro-Asia Shipping: Valuation Dispute over Company Assets 08 May 2001 Sjaiful Bachri Bajumi (Plaintiff)Neutral	08 May 2001	Sjaiful Bachri Bajumi (Plaintiff): Fair value of assets determinedCourt determined the fair value of the Ssangyong shares, Afro-Asia Building, and the rubber plantation.