Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan

Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and mareva injunctions. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory Applications	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Sum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase of Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proof of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	7 cases	88% of cases	Mycitydeal v Villas International: Unpaid Vouchers & Contractual Debt Dispute(Oct 2014) Mycitydeal Ltd v Villas International: Security for Costs Application(Apr 2014) Tanner Sheridan Wayne v NRG Engineering: Withdrawal of Offer to Settle Under Order 22A of the Rules of Court(Nov 2013)
Colin Ng & Partners	1 cases	13% of cases	Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu: Breach of Contract in Share Sale Dispute(Apr 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	38%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Won	34.0 parties avg	4.0	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2010	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(11%)	11%
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	3(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	822,700.00	137,116.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	3 111	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mycitydeal v Villas International: Unpaid Vouchers & Contractual Debt Dispute 08 Oct 2014 Villas International Property Pte Ltd (Defendant, Counterclaimant)Lost	08 Oct 2014	Villas International Property Pte Ltd (Defendant, Counterclaimant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed due to failure to provide sufficient evidence.
2	Mycitydeal Ltd v Villas International: Security for Costs Application 20 Apr 2014 Second defendant (Defendant)Won	20 Apr 2014	Second defendant (Defendant): Appeal UpheldThe appeal against the assistant registrar’s decision to dismiss the plaintiffs’ application for security for costs was dismissed. The court ordered that costs here and below will be costs in the cause. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tanner Sheridan Wayne v NRG Engineering: Withdrawal of Offer to Settle Under Order 22A of the Rules of Court 06 Nov 2013 Tanner Sheridan Wayne (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	06 Nov 2013	Tanner Sheridan Wayne (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $3,500 awarded to the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Lee Shieh-Peen Clement v Ho Chin Nguang: Breach of Mareva Injunction & Asset Disclosure 08 Sep 2010 Kong Yew Seng (Appellant)Won	08 Sep 2010	Kong Yew Seng (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Respondents ordered to restore S$200,000 into their Singapore account within seven days. Costs for this appeal awarded to the Appellants on an indemnity basis and costs on the standard basis below. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lee Shieh-Peen Clement v Ho Chin Nguang: Discovery, Document List, and Translation Dispute 04 May 2010 Lee Shieh-Peen Clement (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	04 May 2010	Lee Shieh-Peen Clement (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Carriernet Global Ltd v Abkey Pte Ltd: Dispute over Keyboard Manufacturing Agreement and Delayed Inventory Delivery 06 Apr 2010 Carriernet Global Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	06 Apr 2010	Carriernet Global Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim not proceeded withThe plaintiff company decided not to proceed with its claim.
7	Frantonios Marine v Kay Swee Tuan: Security for Costs & Companies Act Dispute 17 Jun 2008 Chew Tee Tu (Plaintiff, Appellant)Neutral	17 Jun 2008	Chew Tee Tu (Plaintiff, Appellant): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu: Breach of Contract in Share Sale Dispute 06 Apr 2008 Wee Yue Chew (Plaintiff)Won	06 Apr 2008	Wee Yue Chew (Plaintiff): Judgment for the plaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of S$414,200 together with interest thereon at the rate of 5.33% from the date of the writ to judgment. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff the costs of the action. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.